RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Document Names

+1
abbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:00 AM
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Document Names
> 
> 
> +1 to preserving the names as they are.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: 
> blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
> 
> "Gilbert Pilz" <> wrote on 07/14/2005 12:15:29 AM:
> 
> > Title: Document Names
> > Description: Should the ?names? of the normative documents 
> remain the 
> same as the submission 
> > documents or should they be changed? This issue applies to both
> WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-RM Policy.
> > Justification: The ?name? of a document effects a number of things 
> > such
> as the document 
> > identifier, URIs etc.
> > Target: core, policy
> > Type: editorial
> > Proposal: Preserve the name of the documents as submitted. Changing 
> > the
> names would increase 
> > confusion (already at a high level) around ?OASIS and RM? 
> and result 
> > in
> extra effort. There does 
> > not seem to be any reasons for changing the names forcefull 
> enough to
> override these concerns. 
> > Therefore the names of the normative documents should be 
> ?Web Services
> Reliable Messaging Protocol
> > (WS-ReliableMessaging)? and ?Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy
> Assertion (WS-RM Policy)?
> 
>