oops
+1 the wrong e-mail.
abbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:00 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
>
>
> Blech. I hate 50 foot long URI's, it is so unnecessary.
> Frankly, there's
> no reason that the
> namespace URI needs to include the 'committees' path segment.
> I believe
> that the new AIR provide
> for the use of a pattern as follows (see sect 7.2 and 7.3):
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/[product]/
>
> for a product folder. Also, there is a TC folder which we can use:
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/[tcName]/
>
> We could put the RDDL in either location, hence, it could be
> the root of
> our namespace
> tree. I think that 'wsreliablemessaging' as a value for the
> [product]
> name is too long. Maybe
> we could just leverage the [tcName] and have a namespace URIs like:
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/[yyyymm]/rm
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/[yyyymm]/rm/policy
>
> That's a 44 character namespace URI versus a 74 character
> namespace URI,
> and 51 versus 67.
> Note that despite the fact that there will be a RDDL document
> at the end
> of these URI's, there's no
> need to add a filename with an .html extension. See the
> current namespace
> URIs for example.
>
> I think that the other thing that we want to consider is the
> versioning
> strategy for the namespace
> URI as this will inform us as to whether we might choose a
> namespace URI
> at the start, that doesn't
> change with every CD.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email:
> blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
>
> "Gilbert Pilz" <> wrote on 07/14/2005 12:24:02 AM:
>
> > Title: XML Namespace URIs
> > Description: We need to decide upon the normative XML
> namespace URIs
> that must be used by
> > implementations of these specifications.
> > Justification: Self-evident.
> > Target: all
> > Type: editorial
> > Proposal: The namespace URIs for WS-RX-defined schemas
> should be URLs
> that resolve to RDDL
> > documents that provide information about the schema as well
> as links
> > to
> the corresponding specification(s).
> > Per OASIS guidelines, the RDDL documents must be hosted by OASIS.
> Therefore the exact URL values
> > will need to be co-ordinated with OASIS but, in general, they should
> look something like the following:
> >
> xmlns:wsrm=?http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/wsrelia
> blemessaging-200507.html?
> >
> xmlns:wsrmp=?http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/wsrmpo
> licy-200507.html?
> > Note that the ?200507? in the URL is represents the schema
> version as
> > a
> date (July, 2005).
>
>
