Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Title: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
>
> Description:
> If the RMD terminates the sequence, the RMS cannot know which messages
> are acknowledged. That is why we added CloseSequence. We should
> recommend that RMD's use CloseSequence rather than TerminateSequence.
>
> Justification:
> At the moment the spec says the RMD "may" close the sequence. However,
> unless there is a specific reason (e.g. resource issues, security
> issues etc), it is better if the RMD closes rather than terminates.
Do you mean the RMD sends a sequenceClosed fault to the RMS?
>
> Target: core
> Type: editorial
>
> Proposal:
>
> From WD-10:
>
> At line 381: Replace:
> "In the case where the RM Destination wishes to discontinue use of a
> sequence it may 'close' the sequence itself."
> with
> "In the case where the RM Destination wishes to discontinue use of a
> sequence it is RECOMMENDED that it 'close' the sequence."
>
> Related issues: None
>
> Thanks to Stefan Rossmanith for pointing this out.
>
> Paul
>
--
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt email: ;
Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
