Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate

Yes Tom, I guess it wasn't clear. The issue is whether the RMD sends a 
TSFault or a CSFault, and proposed change is to recommend a CSFault over 
a TSFault.

Paul

Tom Rutt wrote:
> Paul Fremantle wrote:
>
>> Title: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
>>
>> Description:
>> If the RMD terminates the sequence, the RMS cannot know which 
>> messages are acknowledged. That is why we added CloseSequence. We 
>> should recommend that RMD's use CloseSequence rather than 
>> TerminateSequence.
>>
>> Justification:
>> At the moment the spec says the RMD "may" close the sequence. 
>> However, unless there is a specific reason (e.g. resource issues, 
>> security issues etc), it is better if the RMD closes rather than 
>> terminates.
>
> Do you mean the RMD sends a sequenceClosed fault to the RMS?
>
>>
>> Target: core
>> Type: editorial
>>
>> Proposal:
>>
>> From WD-10:
>>
>> At line 381: Replace:
>> "In the case where the RM Destination wishes to discontinue use of a 
>> sequence it may 'close' the sequence itself."
>> with
>> "In the case where the RM Destination wishes to discontinue use of a 
>> sequence it is RECOMMENDED that it 'close' the sequence."
>>
>> Related issues: None
>>
>> Thanks to Stefan Rossmanith for pointing this out.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>
>

-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf


"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com