[ws-sx] RE: Issue PR033: plural agreement

I do not think this one is correct. From my reading of the
current text there isn’t a plural agreement issue.

 

Here is the current text: 

/sp:UsernameToken/wst:Claims 

This optional element
identifies the required claims that a security token must contain in
order to satisfy the token assertion requirements.

 

The proposal below would change this to:

/sp:UsernameToken/wst:Claims 

This optional element
identifies the required claims that a security token must contain in order to satisfy
all token assertion requirements.

 

Maybe I’m misreading this issue and the proposed text
is really:

This optional element
identifies all required claims that a security token must contain in
order to satisfy the token assertion requirements.

 

I think the proposed language to correct the perceived plural
agreement issue introduces a subtle shift in meaning that isn’t intended.

 

I propose we close this one with no action.

 

 

Subject: Issue PR033: plural agreement

 
From:
     Greg Carpenter <> 

 
To:
     "" <> 

 
Date:
     Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:33:00 -0700 

[[ gleaned from the spreadsheet of SP PR comments posted at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx-comment/200704/msg00000.html
]]

Protocol:  ws-securitypolicy

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-diff.pdf

Artifact:  spec / schema

Type: editorial

Title: plural agreement

Description:

lines 840, 908, 989, 1076, 1137,1199, 1275, 1397, 1468,
1534:

“This optional element identifies the required claims
that a security token must contain in order to satisfy the token assertion
requirements” 

Related issues:

None.

Proposed Resolution:

lines 840, 908, 989, 1076, 1137,1199, 1275, 1397, 1468,
1534: Remove "the" or replace with "all"