Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions

From
Thomas Freund <>
Date
2006-03-02T18:34:25+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
Andrew,

I had intended to do a global change (including the refs --- and several additional lines that seem to have been missed in the issue)

Tom

Andrew Wilkinson3 <>

Andrew Wilkinson3 <> 

03/02/2006 11:42 AM

To



cc

Subject

Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions

Max, Tom

In the interests of consistency how far do you plan to go with the changes 

for WS-Coor and WS-BA for issue 15?

I intend to update AT to describe coor with a namespace of 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03. At the moment I don't 

intend to update the non-normative WSCOOR reference to refer to the new 

specification; changing the list of authors and publication date etc. Does 

this seem reasonable -  I don't feel strongly about this, just that it 

would be good for all 3 specs to be updated similarly.

Thanks,

Andy

Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB 

02/03/2006 16:14

To



cc

Subject

[ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions

One further thing.

As a general rule it would help the TC if each WD had cumulative

change-tracking since the last approved draft (CD or PR). We have no

approved draft yet; the base draft with respect to which changes should be

tracked prior to our first CDs is the first drafts that used the OASIS

templates. In this case, please just do your best; if you haven't been

tracking changes in this way so far then just start doing so from now.

Regards,

Ian Robinson

STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect

IBM Hursley Lab, UK



----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 02/03/2006 16:08 -----

 

             Ian 

             Robinson/UK/IBM 

                                                                        To 

             02/03/2006 16:02          wstx-editors 

                                                                        cc 

 

                                                                   Subject 

                                       Editors instructions 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hello Editors,

Per the discussion on the telecon last week, please can you get updated

drafts to the TC by EOD Tues 7 March.

Please use the following conventions to ensure consistency:

On the front page of each spec, please ensure you use the appropriate "doc

identifier", "location" and "Technical committee" name and correct form of

statustext.

1. Doc identifier value (this value should be on the line following

"Document Identifier" and in the page footer)

wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03

wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03

wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03

2. Location value:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf

3. Technical committee

OASIS WS-TX TC

(Note upper case WS-TX)

4. Status.

The first line of the status section should state:

This document is published by the WS-TX TC as a ?working draft".

Please use a file name that is the doc identifier with a ".doc" file

extension e.g wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.doc

We don't need to generate new PDFs yet. We will produce PDFs whenever the

TC adopts a new CD.

The issues that we want to incorporate in these drafts are listed below by

spec.

WS-Coordination

Issues: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 17, (18-21)

WS-AtomicTransaction

Issues: 15, 17

WS-BusinessActivity

Issues: 7, 15, 17,

Regards,

Ian