Andy:
My intention for WS-C was to
update all references in the text, as Tom indicates.
From: Thomas Freund
[mailto:]
Sent: Thu 3/2/2006 10:35 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw:
Editors instructions
Andrew,
I had intended to do a global change (including the refs ---
and several additional lines that seem to have been missed in the
issue)
Tom
Andrew Wilkinson3
<>
Andrew Wilkinson3
<>
03/02/2006 11:42 AM
To
cc
Subject
Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors
instructions
Max,
Tom
In the interests of consistency how far do you plan to go with the
changes
for WS-Coor and WS-BA for issue 15?
I intend to update AT to
describe coor with a namespace of
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03.
At the moment I don't
intend to update the non-normative WSCOOR reference to
refer to the new
specification; changing the list of authors and publication
date etc. Does
this seem reasonable - I don't feel strongly about
this, just that it
would be good for all 3 specs to be updated
similarly.
Thanks,
Andy
Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB
02/03/2006
16:14
To
cc
Subject
[ws-tx-editors]
Fw: Editors instructions
One further
thing.
As a general rule it would help the TC if each WD had
cumulative
change-tracking since the last approved draft (CD or PR). We have
no
approved draft yet; the base draft with respect to which changes should
be
tracked prior to our first CDs is the first drafts that used the
OASIS
templates. In this case, please just do your best; if you haven't
been
tracking changes in this way so far then just start doing so from
now.
Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and
Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab,
UK
----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on
02/03/2006 16:08 -----
Ian
Robinson/UK/IBM
To
02/03/2006 16:02
wstx-editors
cc
Subject
Editors instructions
Hello
Editors,
Per the discussion on the telecon last week, please can you get
updated
drafts to the TC by EOD Tues 7 March.
Please use the following
conventions to ensure consistency:
On the front page of each spec, please
ensure you use the appropriate "doc
identifier", "location" and "Technical
committee" name and correct form of
statustext.
1. Doc identifier
value (this value should be on the line following
"Document Identifier" and
in the page
footer)
wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03
2.
Location value:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
3.
Technical committee
OASIS WS-TX TC
(Note upper case WS-TX)
4.
Status.
The first line of the status section should state:
This document
is published by the WS-TX TC as a ?working draft".
Please use a file name
that is the doc identifier with a ".doc" file
extension e.g
wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.doc
We don't need to generate new PDFs yet. We will
produce PDFs whenever the
TC adopts a new CD.
The issues that we want
to incorporate in these drafts are listed below
by
spec.
WS-Coordination
Issues: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 17,
(18-21)
WS-AtomicTransaction
Issues: 15,
17
WS-BusinessActivity
Issues: 7, 15,
17,
Regards,
Ian
