Resending to the group per Thomas's
request. (Thomas will check on why you can't post directly).
Alex,
Please let us know if you see a problem
with fixing all the occurrances to match the new namespace as Thomas suggests.
Thanks.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
----- Forwarded by Diane
Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 08/17/2006 10:13 AM -----
Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
08/17/2006 05:14 AM
To
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
Subject
Fw: Question on AI 158
Hi Diane,
I've get an mailserver error because
I'm not allowed to post to list .
Can you re-send it for me? Thanks in advance.
Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thomas Schulze
----- Forwarded by Thomas
Schulze/Germany/IBM on 17.08.2006 11:12 -----
Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM
17.08.2006 10:02
To
Diane Jordan <>
cc
"Mark Ford" <>,
Subject
RE: Question on AI 158Link
When changing the namespaces this have
to done very carefully as pointed out by Mark. The current spec contains
a mixture of the old URL namespaces like "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/business-process/"
and newer URN namespaces like "urn:oasis:names:tc:wsbpel:2.0:process:executable"
as documented in AI 158.
I've additionally found some old plnk
namespaces like "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/partner-link/"
(i.e. in chapter 5.1).
IMHO, when Alex is applying Issue 289,
both kinds of outdated URIs, the old URL and the newer URN namespaces,
need to be changed to the final namespaces.
Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thomas Schulze
Diane Jordan <>
17.08.2006 06:05
To
"Mark Ford" <>
cc
Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, <>
Subject
RE: Question on AI 158
I think both of you have good points - the old namespace shouldn't remain
in the spec. It should be replaced with our current namespace.
Mike,
You applied 158 - can you confirm you did it consistently with the most
recent decisions on namespace?
Thanks to all of you for your efforts to improve the quality of the spec.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
"Mark Ford" <>
08/16/2006 05:07 PM
To
"'Thomas Schulze'"
<>
cc
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Subject
RE: Question on AI 158
My concern is that the two occurrences of the older WS-BPEL namespace in
the
current spec might get missed unless covered by an action item of their
own.
This is why I entered 158. If Issue 289 has changed the namespace then
by
all means use the new namespace, but I think 158 should remain.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Schulze [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 4:08 PM
To: Mark Ford
Cc: Diane Jordan
Subject: Question on AI 158
Hi Mark,
I've just seen your AI 158: "Fix namespace for samples in Section
5. From
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/business-process/ to
urn:oasis:names:tc:wsbpel:2.0:process:executable. This occurs in Section
5.1 and Section 5.2"
IMHO the namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:wsbpel:2.0:process:executable"
is
replaced with "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/process/executable"
since today's call. That was the intention of Issue 289 / AI 152. Right?
So, if you agree, can this AI be deleted?
Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thomas Schulze
