Re: [wsrm] Proposal to accomodate Chris Ferris comments - batch 2

I am happy with Doug's edit

Tom Rutt

Doug Bunting wrote:

> Tom,
>
> A few comments below...
>
> On 16-Jul-04 14:18, Tom Rutt wrote:
>
>> Proposed clarification text to accommodate Chris Ferris comments – 
>> second
>> batch
>>
>> Comment 4: Improper reference for ws security
>
> This was comment 3.  Thanks for filling in the details I left out of 
> my "3,4,6,8,10" email.
>
> ...
>
>> Comment 8: Definition of PollRequest message
>
> ...
>
>> “
>> PollRequest Message:
>> A message sent by the Sending RMP to the Receiving RMP that requests 
>> that
>> it respond with RM-Reply information.“
>> “
>
> I would prefer we use the suggestion I made earlier which avoids the 
> passive voice and describes a requirement not made clear elsewhere in 
> the specification:
>
> "A message the Sending RMP sends to the Receiving RMP, requesting 
> RM-Replies for identified earlier Reliable Messages.  Support for this 
> message is REQUIRED as part of the Poll RM-Reply pattern (see section 
> 2.5.3).  This message MAY also be used to augment other RM-Reply 
> patterns."
>
> ...
>
> more later,
>     doug
>

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt	email: ; 
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133