Still sounds odd (a standard spec?)
... how about:
JSR 168 - Java Community Process effort
defining the Java Portlet Specification.
Rich Thompson
Alejandro Abdelnur <>
04/25/2003 01:20 PM
To:
Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, Alejandro
Abdelnur <>
cc:
Subject:
Re: [wsrp] [errata #8] JSR168 description
Rich,
"standardizing the Java Portlet Specification" sounds odd. I
would suggest "defining a standard Java Portlet Specification".
Regards.
Alejandro
Rich Thompson wrote:
Comment:
8. 4/24/03 (William Cox)
Section 3.1.2: "JSR168 – Java Community Process for standardizing
a portlet API." should be written "JSR 168 - a Java Community
Process effort for standardizing the Java Portlet Specification"
Document: Spec
Section: 3.1.2
Old Text: JSR168 – Java Community
Process for standardizing a portlet API.
New Text: JSR 168 - Java Community Process
effort for standardizing the Java Portlet Specification.
