Re: [wsrp] [errata #8] JSR168 description

Title: 

Sounds good to me.

Thanks.

Alejandro

Rich Thompson wrote:

 

  Still sounds odd (a standard spec?)
... how about: 

  

  JSR 168 - Java Community Process effort
defining the Java Portlet Specification. 

  

Rich Thompson 

  

  

  
    
      

         

        
        Alejandro Abdelnur
<>
        
04/25/2003 01:20 PM 

        
                 

                To:        Rich
Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, Alejandro Abdelnur
<> 

                cc:         

                Subject:        Re:
[wsrp] [errata #8] JSR168 description
      

    
  
  

  

  

  Rich,

  

"standardizing the Java Portlet Specification" sounds odd. I would
suggest "defining a standard Java Portlet Specification".

  

Regards.

  

Alejandro

  

Rich Thompson wrote: 

  

Comment: 

8. 4/24/03 (William Cox) 

Section 3.1.2: "JSR168 – Java Community Process for
standardizing a portlet API." should be written "JSR 168 - a Java
Community Process effort for standardizing the Java Portlet
Specification"

  

Document: Spec 

Section: 3.1.2 

Old Text: JSR168 – Java
Community Process for standardizing a portlet API.

New Text: JSR 168 - Java
Community Process effort for standardizing the Java Portlet
Specification.