Another forwarded comment.
Rich Thompson
----- Forwarded by Rich
Thompson/Watson/IBM on 07/09/2003 02:04 PM -----
Michael Freedman <>
04/24/2003 12:35 PM
To:
Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:
Subject:
[Fwd: A minor error in WSRP 0.95 spec]
FYI ...
-------- Original Message --------
Return-Path:
<>
Received:
from rgmum3.us.oracle.com by rgmum2.us.oracle.com with
ESMTP id 1825469261051193268; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:07:48 -0600
Return-Path:
<>
Received:
from ukp13278.uk.oracle.com by rgmum6.us.oracle.com with
ESMTP id 113643611051193211; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:06:51 -0400
Message-ID:
<>
Date:
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:07:50 +0100
From:
Andrew Wright <>
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language:
en, en-us
MIME-Version:
1.0
To:
"MICHAEL.FREEDMAN" <>
Subject:
A minor error in WSRP 0.95 spec
Content-Type:
text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Hi Mike,
I just noticed in 0.95 of the WSRP spec pg 64, ln 20, an URL rewriting
example is given as:
wsrp-rewrite?wsrp-urlType=blockingAction&wsrp-secureURL=true&wsrp-navigationalState=a8h4K5JD9&interactionState=fg4h923mdk/wsrp-rewrite
I think it should be:
wsrp-rewrite?wsrp-urlType=blockingAction&wsrp-secureURL=true&wsrp-navigationalState=a8h4K5JD9&wsrp-interactionState=fg4h923mdk/wsrp-rewrite
Thanks,
Andy.
