Title: RE: [xacml] We resolve ...
Hi,
Thanks, Ken, for the summary.
The amount of discussion around resolutions has been surprisingly low so far. Should Hal and I interpret the silence to mean that everyone is ready to vote in favour of Tim's proposals? Should we interpret the champion-free and/or resolution-free issues as low priority, or "don't care" topics?
I look forward to further feedback on today's policy model subcommittee call and at the F2F on Wednesday and Thursday.
Carlisle.
----------
From:
Ken Yagen[SMTP:]
Sent:
Friday, January 18, 2002 6:46 PM
To:
'Carlisle Adams'; 'XACML'
Subject:
RE: [xacml] We resolve ...
FYI
The following issues do not have champions: PM-5-04, PM-5-05
The following issues do not have any proposed resolutions: PM-2-02, PM-5-05, MI 1-01, MI-4-01, MI-4-02, MI-4-04 (new one on Java Security Model)
Ken
