| RE: [xacml] Groups - cs-xacml-specification-1.1.doc uploaded |
4 |
2003-11-03 |
| RE: [xacml] Put Polar's formal semantics description on web page? |
2 |
2003-11-03 |
| Groups - cs-xacml-specification-1.1.pdf uploaded |
1 |
2003-11-03 |
| [Fwd: [xacml] Groups - cs-xacml-specification-1.1.doc uploaded] |
1 |
2003-11-03 |
| Re: [xacml] Proposed Agenda - October 30 |
1 |
2003-11-05 |
| Re: [xacml] examples in specification |
1 |
2003-11-05 |
| Small adjustment on Item 7: ConditionReference |
1 |
2003-11-06 |
| Request for examples of protecting XML content |
1 |
2003-11-06 |
| minutes? |
1 |
2003-11-12 |
| Minutes from October 30 concall |
1 |
2003-11-12 |
| Proposed Agenda - November 13 |
1 |
2003-11-12 |
| Groups - Full TC Meeting modified |
1 |
2003-11-13 |
| Groups - Focus group modified |
1 |
2003-11-13 |
| Draft Minutes - November 13 |
4 |
2003-11-13 |
| 2.0 Work Item List, v1.26 |
1 |
2003-11-13 |
| Modeling Delegation of Rights in a simplified XACML with Haskell |
8 |
2003-11-18 |
| Re: [xacml] Modeling Delegation of Rights in a simplified XACML withHaskell |
3 |
2003-11-18 |
| W3C Policy Workshop status? |
2 |
2003-11-19 |
| Proposal on item 7 ConditionReference |
1 |
2003-11-20 |
| Notes from focus group meeting 20 Nov 2003 |
2 |
2003-11-20 |
| W3C Member Newsletter, Volume 9,No. 11: 22 November 2003. Forwarded message from Susan Lesch. |
1 |
2003-11-24 |
| next plenary meeting - VOTE |
9 |
2003-11-24 |
| Meeting Thurs 27 November or not? |
3 |
2003-11-24 |
| ACM XML Security workshop presentation |
3 |
2003-11-24 |
| my membership |
1 |
2003-11-25 |
| next meeting vote current results |
3 |
2003-11-25 |
| RE: [xacml] Modeling Delegation of Rights in a simplified XACML w ith Haskell |
1 |
2003-11-25 |
| Groups - Full TC Meeting cancelled |
1 |
2003-11-25 |
| New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understand"? |
2 |
2003-11-25 |
| Error: "obligations that MUST be fulfilled by the PDP" |
1 |
2003-11-25 |
| FW: failure notice. Forwarded message from Rob Grzywinski. |
1 |
2003-11-25 |
| RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa nd"? |
2 |
2003-11-26 |
