Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xri] Status of RelaxNG

From
Gabe Wachob <>
Date
2006-12-04T22:07:05+00:00
ID
000401c717f0$83516d10$a432a8c0@AMSOFTWachob
Thread
RE: [xri] Status of RelaxNG
You'll notice that we've had, for quite a while, a placeholder in the XRI
resolution specs for a RelaxNG schema for the XRD & XRDS documents. We
decided against using RelaxNG early on because we feared that it would be
tilting just a *bit* to far at windmills. That may not be the case any more.


RelaxNG is a different way of thinking about document correctness, but in
many cases, its far simpler and is in closer alignment to what you are
actually trying to do with a schema...

    -Gabe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drummond Reed [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 1:50 PM
> To: ; 
> Subject: [xri] Status of RelaxNG
> 
> Cross-post to XRI & XDI TC lists:
> 
> Laurie Rae pointed out to me the following posts relative to the status of
> adoption of RelaxNG -- it appears its elegance is steadily winning more
> support.
> 
> 	http://cafe.elharo.com/xml/relax-wins/
> 
> 	http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/11/27/Choose-Relax
> 
> 
> =Drummond
Next in thread → Next in month →