Bryan,
The schemas are attached. Thanks for
reviewing them. It’s always good to have another pair of eyes (and XML
processors) check things out.
The <tool> element now has an
extension point for attributes.
Regards,
Doug Domeny
Software Analyst
Ektron, Inc.
+1 603 594-0249 x212
http://www.ektron.com
From: Tony
Jewtushenko [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 2:31 PM
To:
Cc: ;
Subject: RE: [xliff] More XSD
& Spec revisions
Bryan:
Thanks for volunteering. I
agree it's a good idea to QA the schema and samples. Please get the
results with any revisions back to me by close of business Monday so I can get
the ballot marerials together in time for the ballot on Tuesday.
Regards,
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
Sent: 12 May 2006 13:18
To:
;
Cc:
Subject: RE: [xliff] More XSD
& Spec revisions
Hi Tony,
In preparation for
Monday's deadline for final revisions, and Tuesday's ballot, I'll be happy to
run XML diagnostics on the revised XSDs and XLIFF sample files. I know
that Doug will do excellent work, but it would probably be a good to have a
second person do a final QA to ensure XML validity. If for no other
reason, it will put a little mileage on the schema and samples before the
ballot goes out.
Doug, if you want to take
me up on my offer, I'll be available to run tests today and Monday. (this
will be a good time for me to fix the strict sample "almost
everything," where you pointed out that the tool attribute in
the phase element is deprecated.)
Thanks,
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Jewtushenko
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 9:35 AM
To: Schnabel, Bryan S;
Cc: ;
Subject: [xliff] More XSD &
Spec revisions
Asgeir has idendtified a number of other minor
problems with the spec & XSD. I've noted the revisions required
below, but if anyone has any further input please provide it as soon as
possible. I suggest that Doug go ahead and make the necessary changes to
the XSD and I'll send a revised spec later today. We'll need final
revisions done by Monday.
Again thanks for Asgeir for his careful review and
identification of the spec and XSD.
Hopefully this represents the last of the spec issues.
Regards,
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: Asgeir Frimannsson [mailto:]
Sent: 12 May 2006 01:31
To: Tony Jewtushenko
Subject: More XLIFF spec corrections
Hi Tony,
Some further minor corrections to the XLIFF spec:
2.5.1. Adding Elements:
<xliff> and <seg-source> are listed as extension points - they are
not
in the schema
(the listed <xliff> element above also has an incorrect html anchor link)
TONY> this needs to be corrected in the spec.
I'm sure we added an extension point at xliff and I'm somewhat certain
seg-source should also have one.
2.5.2. Adding Attributes:
<xliff> and <seg-source> support non-xliff attributes in the
schema,
but are not listed here.
(This probably relates to the issue above - a mixup when updating the spec?)
In addition, <tool> is currently listed, but does not support
non-xliff attributes in the schema.
TONY>I'll revise the spec but tool needs to be
updated in the schema.
2.5.3. Adding Attribute Values
Again, alttranstype and reformat supports user defined values ('x-')
in the schema, but are not listed here.
TONY>I'll revise the spec
Element detail for <target>:
Missing description of equiv-trans and equiv-trans is not listed in
optional attributes
TONY>I'll revise the spec
Element detail for <group>:
Missing description of merged-trans and merged-trans is not listed in
optional attributes
TONY>I'll revise the spec
Element detail for <alt-trans>
No anchor on <seg-source> element in description
TONY>I'll revise the spec
cheers,
asgeir
xliff-core-1.2-transitional-20060512.xsd
xliff-core-1.2-strict-20060512.xsd
