RE: [xliff] More XSD & Spec revisions

Title: Message

Doug 
and Tony,

 

I 
checked the XSDs and found them to be perfectly valid.  The extension point 
for attributes for <tool is working fine.  I guess the rest of the 
changes all pertained to the spec.

 

I also 
checked the sample files where Tony added the example 
of the <mrk for protected content (see trans-unit 
id="_1_ski_2203").  Tony's updates were perfectly valid.  But I 
noticed in the "Sample_AlmostEverything_1.2_strict.xlf" file a stray "f" was 
typed just below the comment that followed the <count-group 
name="_ski_43782">.  It looked like it might have been a 
"brush-the-finger-over-the-keyboard-but-not-notice-it" mistake.  The 
effect was that the <group element, with the "f" suddenly had PCDATA (which 
made it invalid).  I fixed that, and also removed the "tool" attributes 
from the <phase elements.  I attached the fixed 
file.

 

If we 
use the attached sample file now, I think everything should be 
valid.

 

Thanks,

 

Bryan

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug 
Domeny [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 11:51 
AM
To: 'Tony Jewtushenko'; Schnabel, Bryan S
Cc: 

Subject: RE: [xliff] More XSD & Spec 
revisions

  

  
Bryan,

  
 

  
The schemas are 
  attached. Thanks for reviewing them. It’s always good to have another pair of 
  eyes (and XML processors) check things out.

  
 

  
The <tool> 
  element now has an extension point for 
attributes.

  
 

  

  
Regards,

  
 

  
Doug 
  Domeny

  
Software 
  Analyst

  
 

  
Ektron, 
  Inc.

  
+1 603 594-0249 
  x212

  
http://www.ektron.com

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: Tony 
  Jewtushenko [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 2:31 
  PM
To: 
  
Cc: ; 
  
Subject: 
  RE: [xliff] More XSD & Spec revisions

  
 

  

  
Bryan: 
  

  

  
 

  

  
Thanks for volunteering.  I 
  agree it's a good idea to QA the schema and samples.  Please get the 
  results with any revisions back to me by close of business Monday so I can get 
  the ballot marerials together in time for the ballot on 
  Tuesday.

  

  

Regards,

  

  
Tony

  

  
 

  

  
-----Original 
  Message-----
From: 
   [mailto:] 
  
Sent: 12 May 2006 
  13:18
To: 
  ; 
Cc: 
  
Subject: RE: [xliff] More XSD & Spec 
  revisions

  

  
 

  

  
Hi 
  Tony,

  

  
 

  

  
In 
  preparation for Monday's deadline for final revisions, and Tuesday's ballot, 
  I'll be happy to run XML diagnostics on the revised XSDs and XLIFF sample 
  files.  I know that Doug will do excellent work, but it would probably be 
  a good to have a second person do a final QA to ensure XML validity.  If 
  for no other reason, it will put a little mileage on the schema and samples 
  before the ballot goes out.

  

  
 

  

  
Doug, if 
  you want to take me up on my offer, I'll be available to run tests today and 
  Monday.  (this will be a good time for me to fix the strict sample 
  "almost everything," where you pointed out that the tool attribute 
  in the phase element is deprecated.)

  

  
 

  

  
Thanks,

  

  
 

  

  
Bryan

  

  
 

  

  
-----Original 
  Message-----
From: Tony 
  Jewtushenko [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 9:35 
  AM
To: Schnabel, Bryan S; 
  
Cc: 
  ; 
Subject: [xliff] More XSD & Spec 
  revisions

  

  
 

  

  
 

  

  
Asgeir has idendtified a number of other 
  minor problems with the spec & XSD.  I've noted the revisions 
  required below,  but if anyone has any further input please provide it as 
  soon as possible.  I suggest that Doug go ahead and make the necessary 
  changes to the XSD and I'll send a revised spec later today.  We'll need 
  final revisions done by Monday.  

  

  
 

  

  
Again thanks for Asgeir for his careful 
  review and identification of the spec and 
  XSD.

  

  
 

  

  
Hopefully this represents the last of the 
  spec issues.

  

  
 

  

  
Regards,

  

  
Tony

  

  
 

  

  
 

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: 
  Asgeir Frimannsson [mailto:] 
Sent: 12 May 2006 
  01:31
To: Tony Jewtushenko
Subject: More XLIFF spec 
  corrections

  

  
Hi 
  Tony,

  

  
Some further minor corrections to the 
  XLIFF spec:

  

  
2.5.1. Adding Elements:
<xliff> 
  and <seg-source> are listed as extension points - they are not
in the 
  schema
(the listed <xliff> element above also has an incorrect html 
  anchor link)

  

  
TONY> this needs to be corrected in 
  the spec.  I'm sure we added an extension point at xliff and I'm somewhat 
  certain seg-source should also have one.

  

  

2.5.2. Adding 
  Attributes:
<xliff> and <seg-source> support non-xliff 
  attributes in the schema,
but are not listed here.
(This probably 
  relates to the issue above - a mixup when updating the spec?)
In addition, 
  <tool> is currently listed, but does not support
non-xliff attributes 
  in the schema.

  

  
TONY>I'll revise the spec but tool 
  needs to be updated in the schema.

  

  
2.5.3. Adding Attribute Values
Again, 
  alttranstype and reformat supports user defined values ('x-')
in the 
  schema, but are not listed here.
TONY>I'll revise the 
  spec

  

  
Element detail for 
  <target>:
Missing description of equiv-trans and equiv-trans is not 
  listed in
optional attributes
TONY>I'll revise the 
  spec

  

  
Element detail for 
  <group>:
Missing description of merged-trans and merged-trans is not 
  listed in
optional attributes
TONY>I'll revise the 
  spec

  

  
Element detail for 
  <alt-trans>
No anchor on <seg-source> element in 
  description
TONY>I'll revise the spec

  

  
cheers,
asgeir

  

  
 



Sample_AlmostEverything_1.2_strict.xlf