← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
csprod01 comment 001, improved Format Style Module Processing Requirements
Hi All, Regarding comment 001, Format Style Module Processing Requirements, I see in the Actions (to be) Taken cell it says “Bryan to add the PR with reference to HTML standard object model.” I remember we discussed this, but my memory is that we could not determine an appropriate “standard object model.” And I’m still at a loss to solve this. If we are talking about the HTML DOM, I think that’s very much overkill. And as we said before, and XML validation against an HTML DTD is also overkill. Even the very handy W3C HTML validator (http://validator.w3.org/ ) fails HTML blurbs that really should pass. For example, if the Format Style Module markup resulted in the following just-in-time HTML snip, it would render nicely in a standard HTML browser (but fail in the validator): <html> <h1>Hello</h1> <p>World</p> </html> In fact the language in the initial comment was: “new Processing Requirement: The fs and subFs MUST be configured in such a way that the resulting HTML snippet is valid, such that it can be rendered by a standard HTML browser” Please let me know if you have advice on what HTML standard object model I should refer to. Or, let me know if you think the language from the initial comment will suffice. Thanks, Bryan
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread