Hi David,
From the schema viewpoint Tom sent this:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201402/msg00037.html
As for what value to use: I guess the element names would be fine.
Not sure if it's wise to have a list.
For my concern about the case of deletion.
I think I was reading too much into the definition, thinking the element *had to exist* to be a valid value. But the text can be
interpreted also as an element *could* be there.
So, Tom's fix looks enough for me.
-yves
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:23 AM
To:
Subject: [xliff] Discussion re csprd03 209
Yves, Tom, all
I just realized that I co-own this issue.
[Sorry I was filtering DavidF only so I missed this one that says David..]
AFAIK change track inconsistently re-uses the core appliesTo. As of now I haven't formed an opinion how to best fix that with
minimum impact.
@Tom, did you make any schema changes to alleviate that so far?
@Yves, any suggestions how to best fix that with minimum impact?
Will look into it in more detail shortly, but any more input appreciated
Thanks and regards
dF
Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452
mailto:
