Re: [xliff] One comment on 2.1 draft

Thanks, Yves, it's just a writing idiosyncrasy, your formulation makes much better sense, I will try and catch those for the next build hopefully before 6th October.
Cheers

dF

Dr. David Filip

=======================

OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer 

LRC | CNGL | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: 

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:
Hi David, all,

Looking at the latest 2.1 draft here:

http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/xliff-21/xliff-core-v2.1.pdf

I noticed the phrase "...it MUST be anyway Extracted using..." is used in several places in the ITS section. I think it should be

"...it MUST be always represented using".

The rational:

- I think "anyway" is probably a typo.

- And using "Extracted" seems to assume using the ITS annotation is part of the extraction. But it's not: it can be done at any

time.

Cheers,

-yves

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php