On Sunday 11 November 2001 05:25 pm, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Well, If you think starting somthing against RFC 2396 is gonna fly,
> you have the right to try by yourself :-)
It doesn't yet specify XPointer as the fragment identifier of choice yet does
it?
> I don't buy your counter example :-), name=xxx works on an identical level,
> the users don't even know if it's an ID or not. They know that #foo will
> go there and that's all they look after.
Right, the main advantage of making it somewhat more generic is that it
allows application-level scoping (which is what people really do with anchor
tags anyway).
