TC ArchivesMailing list preservation

So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.

xml-dev · November 2001 · 57 messages · back to month

# Subject From Date
00103 So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Tim Bray 2001-11-09 20:40
00105 RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Champion, Mike 2001-11-09 20:51
00181 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Daniel Veillard 2001-11-09 20:53
00251 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Jonathan Borden 2001-11-10 15:59
00265 RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Champion, Mike 2001-11-10 16:16
00222 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Jonathan Borden 2001-11-10 16:42
00286 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-11 01:42
00285 RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Champion, Mike 2001-11-11 03:15
00224 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-11 06:19
00239 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Daniel Veillard 2001-11-11 10:01
00283 RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Champion, Mike 2001-11-11 13:51
00225 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-11 16:11
00236 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-11 16:14
00209 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Daniel Veillard 2001-11-11 20:36
00220 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-11 21:53
00210 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Daniel Veillard 2001-11-11 22:25
00277 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-11 23:36
00247 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. David Carlisle 2001-11-12 02:12
00246 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-12 03:55
00231 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Justin Couch 2001-11-12 04:00
00204 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Sean McGrath 2001-11-12 09:17
00213 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. David Carlisle 2001-11-12 09:25
00269 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. David Carlisle 2001-11-12 09:31
00203 RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-11-12 14:10
00245 RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-11-12 14:49
00289 RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-11-12 16:09
00278 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-12 20:07
00202 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Tim Bray 2001-11-12 21:40
00216 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Daniel Veillard 2001-11-12 22:26
00258 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. David Carlisle 2001-11-12 22:45
00365 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-12 23:33
00322 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-12 23:34
00307 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-12 23:36
00366 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-12 23:40
00353 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. David Carlisle 2001-11-13 00:08
00326 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. James Clark 2001-11-13 01:00
00395 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. James Clark 2001-11-13 01:45
00324 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-13 04:04
00341 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-13 04:33
00383 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-13 05:01
00397 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Jonathan Borden 2001-11-13 05:04
00327 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. David Brownell 2001-11-13 06:51
00362 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. David Brownell 2001-11-13 07:10
00319 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. David Carlisle 2001-11-13 09:23
00377 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Sean McGrath 2001-11-13 10:45
00318 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. John Cowan 2001-11-13 13:52
00332 RE: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. J C Theriot 2001-11-13 15:20
00335 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Bob Hutchison 2001-11-13 15:21
00379 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Jim Ancona 2001-11-13 15:48
00382 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Bob Hutchison 2001-11-13 16:35
00387 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. David Carlisle 2001-11-13 16:46
00374 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Bob Hutchison 2001-11-13 17:26
00302 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-13 17:41
00300 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-13 17:47
00358 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-13 17:56
00360 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-11-13 18:12
00368 Re: [xml-dev] So maybe ID isn't a problem after all. Jim Ancona 2001-11-13 18:20