Simon wrote:
> In practice, I think the way around this is to encourage people
> to treat attributes with no namespace as if they had the same
> namespace as their element. That doesn't have to mean a simple
> reassignment, though it's certainly possible:
> <http://simonstl.com/ns/namespaces/attributes/>
How is what you're saying different than the semantics implied by local
scoping of elements/attributes (as defined in XSD)? If you assume local
scoping, you're treating them as members of a namespace qualified node.
-aaron
http://staff.develop.com/aarons
