Re: [xml-dev] governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned

 wrote:
> 
> Hi, quick survey of responses here, does it seem reasonable that in a government
> publication(not U.S government) describing various standards as either ones that
> should be abandoned, that are recommended, and that are accepted, that RPC
> should be abandoned 

Could you please elaborate on your specific usage of "RPC" here? Do you
mean SOAP-based RPC mechanisms, distributed object computing
(CORBA/DCOM/RMI), etc.

and that SOAP-based Webservices are accepted - using SOAP
> 1.1, and WSDL 1.1?
> 
> Note that HTTP 1.1 is also accepted, 

Do you mean SOAP over HTTP? HTML and HTTP? etc.

and data integration with xml is
> recomended, so I suppose REST is slightly higher than SOAP. 

What would "higher" mean here? You are referring to a stack?

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

> Although not if I
> ask anyone around here.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>