Re: [xml-dev] governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned

No. Do you have a url for this publication, with date-time stamp? I'd 
like to know the rationale.

Ciao,
Rex

At 11:00 AM +0200 6/24/04,  wrote:
>Hi, quick survey of responses here, does it seem reasonable that in 
>a government
>publication(not U.S government) describing various standards as 
>either ones that
>should be abandoned, that are recommended, and that are accepted, that RPC
>should be abandoned and that SOAP-based Webservices are accepted - using SOAP
>1.1, and WSDL 1.1?
>
>Note that HTTP 1.1 is also accepted, and data integration with xml is
>recomended, so I suppose REST is slightly higher than SOAP. Although not if I
>ask anyone around here.
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>


-- 
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: 
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request