xml-dev

← back

273 messages · 54 threads

# Subject From Date
00016 RE: [xml-dev] UN/CEFACT datatype for x,y geo coordinates? Juerg Tschumperlin 2007-01-31 18:58
00032 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor attacks Tei 2007-02-01 10:27
00040 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor attacks David Carlisle 2007-02-01 10:36
00031 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor attacks Andrew Welch 2007-02-01 11:22
00041 yax XProc (XML Pipeline Language) Implementation, new: ant interface, log4j logging, comprehensive collection of examples [email protected] 2007-02-01 16:34
00062 Look-up tables in XML Schema John Avery 2007-02-02 05:00
00051 Re: [xml-dev] Look-up tables in XML Schema Stephen Green 2007-02-02 09:55
00017 An element with more than one possible type pau carre 2007-02-02 11:08
00029 An element with more than one possible type pau carre 2007-02-02 11:24
00028 Re: [xml-dev] An element with more than one possible type Pete Cordell 2007-02-02 12:07
00019 Re: [xml-dev] An element with more than one possible type Radu Cernuta 2007-02-02 12:48
00049 key and keyref problems pau carre 2007-02-02 16:12
00063 RE: [xml-dev] key and keyref problems Michael Kay 2007-02-02 16:56
00054 RE: [xml-dev] Recent allegations about me Len Bullard 2007-02-03 03:47
00061 Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction Sudheshna Iyer 2007-02-03 23:57
00005 Re: [xml-dev] An element with more than one possible type Rick Marshall 2007-02-04 06:22
00010 RE: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction Michael Kay 2007-02-04 09:30
00043 keyref works in xsd but not in wsdl pau carre 2007-02-05 12:35
00039 Re: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction Pete Cordell 2007-02-05 17:27
00037 RE: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction Michael Kay 2007-02-05 18:00
00044 RE: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction Sudheshna Iyer 2007-02-05 18:16
00009 RE: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction Michael Kay 2007-02-05 19:08
00007 Re: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction Pete Cordell 2007-02-05 20:26
00011 RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Jeff Lowery 2007-02-05 23:24
00002 Re: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction Sudheshna Iyer 2007-02-06 00:27
00015 XML schema model - Java implementations RameshNethi 2007-02-06 07:42
00000 RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations Michael Kay 2007-02-06 08:57
00035 Re: [xml-dev] Performance Vs Size of XSD + Extension of restriction Pete Cordell 2007-02-06 09:17
00046 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Radu Cernuta 2007-02-06 11:49
00047 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? [email protected] 2007-02-06 15:15
00034 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Jeff Lowery 2007-02-06 16:58
00004 OASIS Symposium 2007 Conference Program Available Jane Harnad 2007-02-06 21:24
00012 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Radu Cernuta 2007-02-06 21:58
00006 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Radu Cernuta 2007-02-06 22:00
00008 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Jeff Lowery 2007-02-06 22:20
00055 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Jeff Lowery 2007-02-06 22:26
00058 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? [email protected] 2007-02-06 22:34
00027 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Radu Cernuta 2007-02-06 22:38
00020 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Radu Cernuta 2007-02-06 22:43
00023 Re: [xml-dev] An element with more than one possible type [email protected] 2007-02-07 00:22
00024 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Jeff Lowery 2007-02-07 01:26
00059 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Radu Cernuta 2007-02-07 08:18
00053 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Radu Cernuta 2007-02-07 09:56
00064 DSDL - datatypes, how far along? bryan rasmussen 2007-02-07 13:31
00050 Re: [SPAM] RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations RameshNethi 2007-02-07 16:51
00022 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL - datatypes, how far along? Dave Pawson 2007-02-07 17:41
00025 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Jeff Lowery 2007-02-07 19:36
00060 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Radu Cernuta 2007-02-07 20:02
00052 RE: Erado UCEI: 4.0 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">? Jeff Lowery 2007-02-07 20:16
00056 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL - datatypes, how far along? bryan rasmussen 2007-02-07 20:16
00026 sets of parsing rules Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco) 2007-02-07 22:36
00057 RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations Schneider, John Adam CAR 2007-02-07 22:36
00021 Re: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules Rick Marshall 2007-02-07 23:21
00030 RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations Jeff Lowery 2007-02-07 23:30
00018 RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations Michael Kay 2007-02-07 23:44
00048 RE: Erado UCEI: 5.3 RE: [xml-dev] XML schema model - Java implementations Jeff Lowery 2007-02-07 23:50
00033 RE: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules Waters, Michael, Springer US 2007-02-08 03:02
00003 Re: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules Philippe Poulard 2007-02-08 08:41
00013 RE: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules Michael Kay 2007-02-08 10:05
00014 yax XProc (XML Pipeline Language) Implementation, new: Fop/PDF step, xml catalog awareness for XSLT and XInclude [email protected] 2007-02-08 22:25
00001 Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author? Costello, Roger L. 2007-02-09 12:59
00036 RE: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author? Michael Kay 2007-02-09 15:02
00045 RE: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author? [email protected] 2007-02-09 15:47
00038 RE: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author? Costello, Roger L. 2007-02-09 17:06
00042 RE: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author? [email protected] 2007-02-09 17:42
00117 Re: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author? Pete Cordell 2007-02-09 18:00
00131 Re: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author? Brendan 2007-02-09 18:30
00088 Re: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author? Brendan 2007-02-09 19:22
00073 Looking for an example of importing an xsd into a wsdl Bret Foreman 2007-02-09 22:35
00074 Re: [xml-dev] Brain Teaser: Element Author is of type xsd:string, what's an illegal value of Author? Rick Jelliffe 2007-02-10 06:46
00087 XForms.org Kurt Cagle 2007-02-12 00:38
00132 Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? Costello, Roger L. 2007-02-12 12:44
00115 Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? bryan rasmussen 2007-02-12 13:12
00130 RE: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? Michael Kay 2007-02-12 13:58
00119 Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? bryan rasmussen 2007-02-12 14:04
00104 RE: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? Costello, Roger L. 2007-02-12 14:09
00092 Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? bryan rasmussen 2007-02-12 14:39
00152 Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? Peter Hunsberger 2007-02-12 15:00
00161 Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? Frank Manola 2007-02-12 15:58
00162 RE: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? [email protected] 2007-02-12 17:24
00151 anyone familiar with a xml format for describing keyboard mappings? bryan rasmussen 2007-02-12 20:28
00094 xsd + wsdl + WS-I Bret Foreman 2007-02-13 00:27
00103 xmlSchemaValidateDoc Suresh Chandak 2007-02-13 02:01
00090 Re: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? Rick Jelliffe 2007-02-13 02:27
00105 RE: [xml-dev] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? Michael Kay 2007-02-13 13:30
00089 RE: [xml-dev] sets of parsing rules Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco) 2007-02-13 17:54
00107 More predictions to mull over Michael Champion 2007-02-14 07:07
00163 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Len Bullard 2007-02-14 11:03
00150 [Summary] Schematron Question: proper way to express the text version of assertions? Costello, Roger L. 2007-02-14 12:38
00149 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Elliotte Harold 2007-02-14 13:27
00164 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Elliotte Harold 2007-02-14 13:31
00106 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Elliotte Harold 2007-02-14 13:43
00091 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Elliotte Harold 2007-02-14 13:52
00102 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over bryan rasmussen 2007-02-14 14:01
00093 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over [email protected] 2007-02-14 14:36
00128 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Len Bullard 2007-02-14 15:03
00120 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Michael Kay 2007-02-14 15:08
00075 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Stefan Tilkov 2007-02-14 15:21
00086 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Michael Champion 2007-02-14 15:39
00085 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Len Bullard 2007-02-14 15:52
00076 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Len Bullard 2007-02-14 15:58
00118 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Elliotte Harold 2007-02-14 16:04
00129 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over [email protected] 2007-02-14 16:25
00116 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Bret Foreman 2007-02-14 16:56
00133 Re: [xml-dev] Looking for an example of importing an xsd into a wsdl Fraser Goffin 2007-02-14 17:11
00158 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Lindsey, Jack 2007-02-14 19:55
00112 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Robin Berjon 2007-02-14 21:06
00143 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Greg Hunt 2007-02-14 21:11
00095 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Rick Marshall 2007-02-14 21:51
00113 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Len Bullard 2007-02-15 00:39
00097 Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Stephen Green 2007-02-15 16:22
00141 Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Stephen Green 2007-02-15 21:09
00159 XML Schema Datatypes - token, string, normalizedString - any difference? Costello, Roger L. 2007-02-16 12:29
00146 xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" Sudheshna Iyer 2007-02-16 15:49
00157 RE: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" Sreeni Yetchina -X (syetchin - Pure Solutions at Cisco) 2007-02-16 15:51
00070 RE: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" Sudheshna Iyer 2007-02-16 17:07
00079 RE: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" [email protected] 2007-02-16 17:16
00135 Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" Pete Cordell 2007-02-16 17:29
00127 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Datatypes - token, string, normalizedString - any difference? derek denny-brown 2007-02-16 19:35
00125 Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" derek denny-brown 2007-02-16 20:19
00136 Re:&nbsp;[xml-dev]&nbsp;xml&nbsp;with&nbsp;no&nbsp;-->"<?xml&nbsp; version?>" Rick Jelliffe 2007-02-16 23:09
00078 Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" Julian Reschke 2007-02-17 12:00
00072 RE: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" Michael Kay 2007-02-17 22:20
00080 Re: [SPAM] [xml-dev] anyone familiar with a xml format for describing keyboard mappings? Martin Probst 2007-02-18 09:03
00067 Re: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Radu Cernuta 2007-02-18 11:17
00084 RE: [xml-dev] More predictions to mull over Len Bullard 2007-02-18 11:59
00065 Online writeup of recent Schematron discussions Costello, Roger L. 2007-02-18 19:13
00123 Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" Philippe Poulard 2007-02-19 08:38
00138 a namespace definitions related question(s) Shlomo Yona 2007-02-19 09:19
00139 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Bjoern Hoehrmann 2007-02-19 09:27
00122 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Anne Thomas Manes 2007-02-19 12:13
00069 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Elliotte Harold 2007-02-19 16:56
00081 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Stephen Green 2007-02-19 17:12
00071 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Elliotte Harold 2007-02-19 17:32
00077 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Robin Berjon 2007-02-19 17:38
00147 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Elliotte Harold 2007-02-19 17:43
00154 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Stephen Green 2007-02-19 17:49
00111 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Stephen Green 2007-02-19 17:52
00098 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Elliotte Harold 2007-02-19 17:56
00101 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Elliotte Harold 2007-02-19 17:58
00108 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Stephen Green 2007-02-19 18:00
00155 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Elliotte Harold 2007-02-19 18:01
00145 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Stephen Green 2007-02-19 18:04
00160 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Stephen Green 2007-02-19 18:06
00142 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Pete Cordell 2007-02-19 18:18
00100 RE: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Michael Champion 2007-02-19 18:22
00109 RE: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Stephen Green 2007-02-19 18:47
00156 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Elliotte Harold 2007-02-19 19:19
00144 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Elliotte Harold 2007-02-19 19:24
00148 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Elliotte Harold 2007-02-19 19:26
00153 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 [email protected] 2007-02-19 19:58
00110 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Rick Marshall 2007-02-19 20:42
00099 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Richard Salz 2007-02-19 21:12
00114 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [ubl-dev] Top 10 uses of XML in 2007 Robert Koberg 2007-02-19 21:47
00121 YouTube videos re: documents and XML G. Ken Holman 2007-02-20 01:46
00096 Re: [xml-dev] xml with no -->"<?xml version?>" Rick Jelliffe 2007-02-20 03:44
00140 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Rick Jelliffe 2007-02-20 03:48
00068 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Shlomo Yona 2007-02-20 09:27
00082 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) bryan rasmussen 2007-02-20 09:49
00083 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Pete Cordell 2007-02-20 10:10
00066 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Michael Kay 2007-02-20 12:17
00124 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Michael Kay 2007-02-20 12:19
00137 Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML) Len Bullard 2007-02-20 13:01
00126 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Shlomo Yona 2007-02-20 15:49
00217 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Shlomo Yona 2007-02-20 15:55
00231 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) [email protected] 2007-02-20 15:55
00134 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Chris Burdess 2007-02-20 15:55
00187 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Richard Salz 2007-02-20 15:55
00188 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Shlomo Yona 2007-02-20 15:59
00173 Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML) Tei 2007-02-20 16:06
00174 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Chris Burdess 2007-02-20 16:08
00232 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) [email protected] 2007-02-20 16:18
00215 RDDL documents Norman Walsh 2007-02-20 16:22
00230 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) [email protected] 2007-02-20 16:26
00219 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) [email protected] 2007-02-20 17:07
00204 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Anne Thomas Manes 2007-02-20 17:33
00192 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Pete Cordell 2007-02-20 17:45
00252 RE: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML) Len Bullard 2007-02-20 17:46
00261 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Shlomo Yona 2007-02-20 19:02
00262 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Shlomo Yona 2007-02-20 19:03
00251 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) [email protected] 2007-02-20 22:57
00194 Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML) Rick Marshall 2007-02-21 00:14
00203 RE: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML) Len Bullard 2007-02-21 03:10
00190 Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML) Rick Marshall 2007-02-21 03:25
00205 RE: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML) Robin Cover 2007-02-21 03:35
00189 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Shlomo Yona 2007-02-21 04:31
00207 RE: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Shlomo Yona 2007-02-21 04:45
00263 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) Chris Burdess 2007-02-21 08:51
00250 Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s) [email protected] 2007-02-21 12:57
00249 Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML) Tei 2007-02-21 13:00
00264 duplicate dc:identifer tags tom tom 2007-02-21 17:44
00206 java 6 XMLReaderFactory Elliotte Harold 2007-02-21 20:40
00191 better (?) than DOM Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco) 2007-02-22 00:02
00202 No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Len Bullard 2007-02-22 12:45
00193 RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Michael Kay 2007-02-22 13:38
00228 RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Andrew S. Townley 2007-02-22 14:49
00220 RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Michael Champion 2007-02-22 15:32
00175 RE: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco) 2007-02-22 17:45
00185 RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Len Bullard 2007-02-22 18:27
00186 RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Len Bullard 2007-02-22 18:27
00176 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Elliotte Harold 2007-02-22 18:35
00218 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Richard Salz 2007-02-22 19:03
00229 Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM Manos Batsis 2007-02-22 19:35
00216 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Rick Marshall 2007-02-22 21:00
00233 Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM John Avery 2007-02-22 22:27
00258 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware David Lyon 2007-02-22 22:35
00243 Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM derek denny-brown 2007-02-23 02:16
00195 xsd to xml generation Suresh Chandak 2007-02-23 02:52
00213 Re. Last Call Working Draft Review for XForms 1.1 Stephen Green 2007-02-23 10:27
00212 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Robin Berjon 2007-02-23 11:48
00197 Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM Robin Berjon 2007-02-23 11:51
00241 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Robin Berjon 2007-02-23 11:54
00246 Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM Manos Batsis 2007-02-23 11:57
00259 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Robin Berjon 2007-02-23 11:58
00257 Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM Robin Berjon 2007-02-23 11:59
00170 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Anne Thomas Manes 2007-02-23 12:01
00179 Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM Robin Berjon 2007-02-23 12:02
00235 Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM Robert Koberg 2007-02-23 12:33
00227 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Elliotte Harold 2007-02-23 12:33
00225 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Robin Berjon 2007-02-23 13:00
00236 RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Michael Kay 2007-02-23 13:31
00178 When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) David Megginson 2007-02-23 15:10
00172 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Elliotte Harold 2007-02-23 15:28
00180 RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware [email protected] 2007-02-23 16:02
00167 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware derek denny-brown 2007-02-23 18:44
00184 RE: [xml-dev] better (?) than DOM Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco) 2007-02-23 19:34
00165 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Elliotte Harold 2007-02-23 19:49
00223 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware [email protected] 2007-02-23 21:31
00238 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Len Bullard 2007-02-24 11:36
00239 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Anne Thomas Manes 2007-02-24 12:53
00222 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) [email protected] 2007-02-24 14:19
00169 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Stefan Tilkov 2007-02-24 14:28
00181 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) [email protected] 2007-02-24 14:36
00171 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Michael Kay 2007-02-24 15:36
00177 Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware Wei Lu 2007-02-24 15:54
00247 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) [email protected] 2007-02-24 16:56
00254 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Len Bullard 2007-02-24 21:23
00211 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) [email protected] 2007-02-24 21:41
00198 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Len Bullard 2007-02-24 22:45
00201 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Ian Graham 2007-02-25 19:44
00208 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Len Bullard 2007-02-25 20:03
00255 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Robert Koberg 2007-02-25 21:11
00245 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Rick Marshall 2007-02-25 21:30
00260 [ANN]VTD-XML 2.0 Harry Xu 2007-02-26 02:31
00242 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Len Bullard 2007-02-26 03:55
00200 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Len Bullard 2007-02-26 04:01
00209 Announce:XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0RC2 Yves Zoundi 2007-02-26 13:44
00256 A Fun Business Idea Len Bullard 2007-02-26 14:39
00244 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Richard Salz 2007-02-26 15:47
00248 Re: [xml-dev] A Fun Business Idea Stefan Tilkov 2007-02-26 15:54
00253 Announce: Webswell Connect 2.0.6 - open source web services integration tool is released Ladislav Urban 2007-02-26 16:11
00210 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Tei 2007-02-26 18:58
00199 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) David Megginson 2007-02-26 19:16
00214 RE: [xml-dev] A Fun Business Idea Len Bullard 2007-02-26 19:24
00196 Re: [xml-dev] A Fun Business Idea Elliotte Harold 2007-02-26 19:27
00240 Re: xsd to xml generation Suresh Chandak 2007-02-26 20:19
00221 Re: [xml-dev] Re: xsd to xml generation Bjoern Hoehrmann 2007-02-26 20:25
00168 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Michael Kay 2007-02-26 21:31
00182 Re: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Elliotte Harold 2007-02-26 21:51
00183 [ANN] last two days to submit proposals for XML Prague 2007 Petr Cimprich 2007-02-26 21:58
00166 Re: [xml-dev] Re: xsd to xml generation Suresh Chandak 2007-02-26 22:08
00224 Re: [xml-dev] RDDL documents Paul Denning 2007-02-26 22:31
00237 AW: [xml-dev] Re: xsd to xml generation [email protected] 2007-02-27 05:55
00226 "Metalinks (XML format) Tries to Simplify Downloads" [email protected] 2007-02-27 07:40
00234 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Stephen Green 2007-02-27 09:51
00268 RE: [xml-dev] When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Richard Salz 2007-02-27 11:44
00271 Generic vs Specific WSDL David Carver 2007-02-27 20:28
00267 Re: When parsing speed matters (was Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware) Boris Kolpackov 2007-02-27 20:37
00265 Re: [xml-dev] Generic vs Specific WSDL Stefan Tilkov 2007-02-27 20:48
00266 Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures Len Bullard 2007-02-28 12:25
00272 Re: [xml-dev] Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures Robert Koberg 2007-02-28 22:30
00270 Re: [xml-dev] Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures Robert Koberg 2007-02-28 22:48
00269 RE: [xml-dev] Speed in Languages and Browser Architectures Len Bullard 2007-03-01 04:38