Len Bullard wrote:
> My problem with the subset idea is simply what this thread usually produces:
> it's tough to get buy in on what to leave in or leave out. IME, DTDs are
> more likely to be understood by non-XML-Dev developers than XSD, yet it is
> always top of the death list. Everyone hates namespaces but no one has a
> proposal to submit. And so on...
>
DTDs aren't on the death list. They're on the move list.
The internal DTD subset is on the death list. That's a critical
distinction.
The internal DTD subset is probably the single biggest stumbling block
for parser implementers.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
