| 00059 |
Are documents loosing the web? |
Eric van der Vlist
|
2008-02-01 08:51 |
| 00048 |
Benefits of validation |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-01 11:20 |
| 00035 |
Re: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-01 12:45 |
| 00023 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-01 14:00 |
| 00079 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
Eric van der Vlist
|
2008-02-01 14:11 |
| 00088 |
Re: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-01 14:44 |
| 00089 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-01 14:49 |
| 00078 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
Eric van der Vlist
|
2008-02-01 15:07 |
| 00025 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
Leendert Poot
|
2008-02-01 15:13 |
| 00034 |
Re: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-01 15:23 |
| 00021 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-01 15:25 |
| 00036 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-01 15:30 |
| 00020 |
RE:[SUMMARY] [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 Best Practice Issue: Graceful Degradation |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2008-02-01 16:50 |
| 00038 |
EditiX XML Editor - 2008 RC1 |
Alexandre Brillant
|
2008-02-01 18:18 |
| 00090 |
RE: [xml-dev] can MSV accept more than one schema files at once |
Zhenyu Dai
|
2008-02-01 18:21 |
| 00077 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-01 18:42 |
| 00076 |
[OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-03 16:33 |
| 00091 |
[ann: debugxslt v.0.1]: a very experimental xslt lint checker using latest schematron |
James Fuller
|
2008-02-03 16:48 |
| 00037 |
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-03 17:22 |
| 00022 |
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-04 03:57 |
| 00033 |
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ? |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2008-02-04 04:17 |
| 00024 |
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-04 04:30 |
| 00057 |
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-04 07:53 |
| 00049 |
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-04 08:25 |
| 00008 |
Press Release - CECID Contributed OSB Service Bus to CECID Community Website |
Patrick Yee
|
2008-02-05 03:09 |
| 00019 |
Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0 |
Marshall, Steven (SKM)
|
2008-02-05 04:39 |
| 00018 |
Re: [xml-dev] Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-05 05:02 |
| 00009 |
SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-05 09:34 |
| 00047 |
RE: [xml-dev] Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0 |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-05 12:04 |
| 00070 |
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-05 17:27 |
| 00058 |
[xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType? |
XGuy
|
2008-02-05 17:30 |
| 00046 |
RE: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-05 18:08 |
| 00085 |
Re: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-05 18:22 |
| 00060 |
RE: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType? |
XGuy
|
2008-02-05 18:22 |
| 00026 |
RE: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType? |
XGuy
|
2008-02-05 19:09 |
| 00044 |
Re: SQL instead of XQuery |
Andrzej Jan Taramina
|
2008-02-05 19:18 |
| 00043 |
Re: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-05 20:03 |
| 00086 |
Re: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType? |
XGuy
|
2008-02-05 20:07 |
| 00028 |
[ANN] Metalink (XML for describing downloads: mirrors, checksums, etc) |
Anthony Bryan
|
2008-02-05 20:16 |
| 00068 |
Re: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-05 20:24 |
| 00005 |
The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Ken North
|
2008-02-05 20:40 |
| 00073 |
re[xml-dev] ferencing an already declared element in the schema(not a global element) |
XGuy
|
2008-02-05 20:44 |
| 00084 |
RE: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-05 20:55 |
| 00012 |
Re: [xml-dev] re[xml-dev] ferencing an already declared element in the schema(not a global element) |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-05 22:06 |
| 00062 |
RE: [xml-dev] re[xml-dev] ferencing an already declared element in the schema(not a global element) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-05 22:17 |
| 00056 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-05 23:46 |
| 00054 |
Re: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-06 08:31 |
| 00013 |
Re[2]: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-06 11:38 |
| 00007 |
Re[2]: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-06 11:38 |
| 00052 |
Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-06 11:38 |
| 00063 |
Call for Papers: XIME-P 2008 |
Carl-Christian Kanne
|
2008-02-06 11:55 |
| 00011 |
Re: [distribution] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-06 12:23 |
| 00017 |
Re[2]: [offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-06 12:30 |
| 00002 |
Re: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-06 12:41 |
| 00000 |
Re: [offtopic] Re: SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-06 12:42 |
| 00065 |
Re[2]: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-06 12:48 |
| 00066 |
Re: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-06 12:57 |
| 00051 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re[2]: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-06 13:47 |
| 00004 |
Re: Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility - XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron |
Zhiwu Xie
|
2008-02-06 21:48 |
| 00014 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Ken North
|
2008-02-06 23:53 |
| 00006 |
[xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Ken North
|
2008-02-07 00:18 |
| 00010 |
XPath 2.0 and XQuery Quick Reference Cards |
Dan Vint
|
2008-02-07 01:37 |
| 00074 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility - XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron |
Zhiwu Xie
|
2008-02-07 01:56 |
| 00042 |
[distribution] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-07 06:12 |
| 00029 |
[offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-07 06:16 |
| 00032 |
[personal] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-07 06:38 |
| 00081 |
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 and XQuery Quick Reference Cards |
Dave Pawson
|
2008-02-07 07:49 |
| 00039 |
[offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-07 08:43 |
| 00072 |
[main] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-07 08:43 |
| 00082 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-07 09:55 |
| 00069 |
Applying enumeration-facet on list type |
Eran Balter
|
2008-02-07 12:06 |
| 00087 |
Timezone ambiguities in date built-in type |
Eran Balter
|
2008-02-07 12:18 |
| 00083 |
Re: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-07 12:37 |
| 00031 |
[ANN] CodeSynthesis XSD 3.1.0 released |
Boris Kolpackov
|
2008-02-07 14:07 |
| 00040 |
RE: [xml-dev] Timezone ambiguities in date built-in type |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-07 15:11 |
| 00071 |
Re: [xml-dev] Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0 |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-07 18:40 |
| 00075 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-07 18:49 |
| 00080 |
RE: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-07 18:56 |
| 00041 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-07 21:43 |
| 00030 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-07 22:54 |
| 00045 |
Re: [offtopic] Re: SQL instead of XQuery |
Andrzej Jan Taramina
|
2008-02-07 22:54 |
| 00027 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-07 23:39 |
| 00067 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-08 00:38 |
| 00050 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Xia Li
|
2008-02-08 01:14 |
| 00003 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-08 01:33 |
| 00015 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-08 02:38 |
| 00016 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-08 10:09 |
| 00001 |
Word processors and semantic content |
Laurens van den Oever
|
2008-02-08 12:50 |
| 00053 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-08 13:07 |
| 00064 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-08 13:11 |
| 00055 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [offtopic] Re: SQL instead of XQuery |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-08 13:20 |
| 00061 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-08 14:22 |
| 00144 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-08 16:22 |
| 00158 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing |
W. E. Perry
|
2008-02-08 18:03 |
| 00115 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Xia Li
|
2008-02-08 18:53 |
| 00100 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-08 19:01 |
| 00101 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-08 19:35 |
| 00114 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing |
W. E. Perry
|
2008-02-08 20:35 |
| 00159 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-08 20:46 |
| 00142 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML da tabaseprocessing |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-08 21:15 |
| 00157 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Jim Melton
|
2008-02-08 22:27 |
| 00146 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-08 23:58 |
| 00131 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-09 00:27 |
| 00119 |
Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2008-02-10 14:58 |
| 00179 |
Re: [xml-dev] Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots |
Philippe Poulard
|
2008-02-10 15:18 |
| 00188 |
Re: [xml-dev] Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots |
James Fuller
|
2008-02-10 15:34 |
| 00189 |
Re: [xml-dev] Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots |
Manfred Staudinger
|
2008-02-10 17:19 |
| 00178 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-10 23:00 |
| 00121 |
Re[2]: [offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-10 23:41 |
| 00130 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing |
Ken North
|
2008-02-11 06:52 |
| 00117 |
Re: SQL instead of XQuery [main] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-11 07:47 |
| 00132 |
XPath search problem |
Marshall, Steven (SKM)
|
2008-02-11 08:35 |
| 00116 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-11 09:14 |
| 00134 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: SQL instead of XQuery [main] |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-11 09:26 |
| 00190 |
Re: [xml-dev] XPath search problem |
Philippe Poulard
|
2008-02-11 09:53 |
| 00177 |
RE: [xml-dev] XPath search problem |
Laurens van den Oever
|
2008-02-11 09:58 |
| 00176 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-11 11:43 |
| 00133 |
SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-11 12:30 |
| 00191 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
James Fuller
|
2008-02-11 12:51 |
| 00118 |
SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-11 12:55 |
| 00129 |
XPath(ish) in the browser |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-11 14:52 |
| 00120 |
[xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
Ken North
|
2008-02-11 17:09 |
| 00155 |
LinkedData Planet call for speakers closes February 15, 2008 |
Ken North
|
2008-02-11 17:33 |
| 00147 |
RE: Word processors and semantic content |
Cox, Bruce
|
2008-02-11 17:41 |
| 00102 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
James Fuller
|
2008-02-11 17:46 |
| 00113 |
[xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Ken North
|
2008-02-11 17:51 |
| 00112 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-11 18:09 |
| 00103 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-11 18:45 |
| 00145 |
RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-11 18:51 |
| 00156 |
RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-11 20:21 |
| 00143 |
RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-11 20:36 |
| 00139 |
Re: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-11 21:16 |
| 00160 |
ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-11 21:38 |
| 00185 |
Re: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Ken North
|
2008-02-11 22:09 |
| 00170 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-11 22:37 |
| 00122 |
RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-11 22:42 |
| 00140 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-11 22:50 |
| 00124 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-11 23:03 |
| 00168 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Daniel L. Koger
|
2008-02-11 23:50 |
| 00186 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-11 23:51 |
| 00173 |
Word processors and semantic content |
Ken North
|
2008-02-12 00:12 |
| 00184 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 02:13 |
| 00097 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 02:16 |
| 00106 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 03:06 |
| 00162 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 03:11 |
| 00154 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 03:19 |
| 00152 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Eric van der Vlist
|
2008-02-12 07:28 |
| 00094 |
Re[2]: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-12 08:38 |
| 00092 |
Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-12 08:47 |
| 00165 |
Re: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-12 08:49 |
| 00163 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-12 09:10 |
| 00166 |
Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-12 09:34 |
| 00150 |
Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-12 09:46 |
| 00107 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 09:50 |
| 00105 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-12 10:03 |
| 00099 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-12 10:09 |
| 00111 |
Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-12 10:18 |
| 00149 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-12 10:49 |
| 00096 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
Ken North
|
2008-02-12 11:06 |
| 00108 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-12 11:17 |
| 00098 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-12 11:25 |
| 00104 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-12 11:31 |
| 00125 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-12 11:47 |
| 00174 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-12 12:12 |
| 00181 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 12:31 |
| 00128 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 12:31 |
| 00138 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 12:56 |
| 00135 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Joe Fawcett
|
2008-02-12 13:46 |
| 00172 |
SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-12 13:52 |
| 00182 |
[main] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-12 13:52 |
| 00187 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Richard Salz
|
2008-02-12 14:42 |
| 00169 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 14:52 |
| 00127 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-12 15:21 |
| 00136 |
RE: [xml-dev] [main] SQL instead of XQuery |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-12 15:41 |
| 00183 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Joe Fawcett
|
2008-02-12 15:51 |
| 00171 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-12 16:33 |
| 00175 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 16:36 |
| 00180 |
RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-12 16:47 |
| 00137 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 16:52 |
| 00141 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-12 16:53 |
| 00126 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Ken North
|
2008-02-12 17:00 |
| 00123 |
RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-12 17:11 |
| 00167 |
Re: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Ken North
|
2008-02-12 17:24 |
| 00148 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 17:27 |
| 00095 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-12 17:39 |
| 00109 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-12 17:43 |
| 00110 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-12 17:54 |
| 00093 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Julian Reschke
|
2008-02-12 18:05 |
| 00151 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-12 18:12 |
| 00164 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-12 18:43 |
| 00153 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Eric van der Vlist
|
2008-02-12 19:31 |
| 00161 |
Synchronicity or pseudonym? Bill Gates announces Microsoft commitment to declarative programming |
Ken North
|
2008-02-12 20:49 |
| 00244 |
Re: [xml-dev] Synchronicity or pseudonym? Bill Gates announces Microsoft commitment to declarative programming |
Robin Cover
|
2008-02-12 21:39 |
| 00258 |
Re: [xml-dev] Synchronicity or pseudonym? Bill Gates announces Microsoft commitment to declarative programming |
Ken North
|
2008-02-12 23:34 |
| 00215 |
SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-13 07:01 |
| 00200 |
SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-13 07:08 |
| 00201 |
[main] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-13 08:42 |
| 00214 |
SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-13 09:01 |
| 00259 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-13 09:18 |
| 00242 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-13 10:11 |
| 00257 |
RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-13 10:18 |
| 00246 |
[main] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-13 14:42 |
| 00231 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-13 19:37 |
| 00219 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-13 20:17 |
| 00279 |
W3C XML is Ten Years Old |
Liam Quin
|
2008-02-14 00:49 |
| 00288 |
Re: [xml-dev] [main] SQL instead of XQuery |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-14 02:26 |
| 00289 |
ANN: Best Practices for XML Internationalization |
Felix Sasaki
|
2008-02-14 05:53 |
| 00278 |
SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-14 07:22 |
| 00221 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-14 17:35 |
| 00230 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Philip Fearon
|
2008-02-14 22:55 |
| 00217 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Tim Bray
|
2008-02-15 00:30 |
| 00232 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2008-02-15 05:50 |
| 00216 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-15 09:35 |
| 00234 |
[main] SQL instead of XQuery |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-15 10:31 |
| 00290 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Jirka Kosek
|
2008-02-15 10:45 |
| 00277 |
SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-15 11:10 |
| 00276 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-15 11:53 |
| 00291 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-15 12:03 |
| 00233 |
SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic] |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-15 12:09 |
| 00218 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-15 15:47 |
| 00229 |
Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-15 16:05 |
| 00220 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-15 17:10 |
| 00255 |
RE: Word processors and semantic content |
Laurens van den Oever
|
2008-02-15 17:28 |
| 00247 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content |
Laurens van den Oever
|
2008-02-15 17:31 |
| 00202 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-15 18:25 |
| 00213 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-15 18:43 |
| 00212 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-15 20:20 |
| 00203 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-15 21:28 |
| 00245 |
RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-15 22:53 |
| 00256 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-16 02:47 |
| 00243 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-16 02:49 |
| 00260 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-16 03:00 |
| 00285 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-16 03:35 |
| 00270 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-16 03:57 |
| 00222 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-16 08:50 |
| 00240 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Champion
|
2008-02-16 09:12 |
| 00239 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-16 13:24 |
| 00224 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-16 14:08 |
| 00268 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Dave Pawson
|
2008-02-16 15:30 |
| 00286 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-16 17:30 |
| 00273 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-16 18:15 |
| 00284 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Liam Quin
|
2008-02-16 18:48 |
| 00197 |
Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- Recursive Processing |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-16 19:57 |
| 00206 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-16 21:45 |
| 00262 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-17 00:19 |
| 00254 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-17 11:00 |
| 00252 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Philippe Poulard
|
2008-02-17 16:28 |
| 00263 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-18 00:42 |
| 00205 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jelks Cabaniss
|
2008-02-18 03:03 |
| 00199 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Nicholas Sushkin
|
2008-02-18 05:12 |
| 00207 |
Several external entities in an XML |
Jonathan Ceballos Rodriguez
|
2008-02-18 11:00 |
| 00194 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-18 11:24 |
| 00211 |
RE: [xml-dev] Several external entities in an XML |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-18 11:43 |
| 00192 |
Re: [xml-dev] Several external entities in an XML |
Manos Batsis
|
2008-02-18 11:58 |
| 00250 |
RE: [xml-dev] Several external entities in an XML |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-18 12:20 |
| 00265 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-18 14:08 |
| 00266 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-18 14:55 |
| 00249 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Nicholas Sushkin
|
2008-02-18 14:57 |
| 00196 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-18 14:59 |
| 00198 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-18 15:27 |
| 00208 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-18 15:29 |
| 00204 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-18 16:09 |
| 00274 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Kevin S. Clarke
|
2008-02-18 16:26 |
| 00281 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:33 |
| 00272 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:35 |
| 00225 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:35 |
| 00238 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Joe Fawcett
|
2008-02-18 16:36 |
| 00228 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:39 |
| 00235 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:43 |
| 00226 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:47 |
| 00282 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-18 16:48 |
| 00241 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:51 |
| 00269 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:54 |
| 00287 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Tony Graham
|
2008-02-18 16:54 |
| 00227 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 16:59 |
| 00209 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Eric van der Vlist
|
2008-02-18 17:02 |
| 00236 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 17:02 |
| 00283 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Kevin S. Clarke
|
2008-02-18 17:04 |
| 00275 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jim Melton
|
2008-02-18 17:11 |
| 00271 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Philippe Poulard
|
2008-02-18 17:12 |
| 00280 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-18 17:23 |
| 00237 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-18 17:23 |
| 00248 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-18 17:28 |
| 00210 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-18 17:29 |
| 00223 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-18 17:31 |
| 00267 |
XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?) |
Nicholas Sushkin
|
2008-02-18 17:33 |
| 00193 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-18 17:36 |
| 00195 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-18 17:37 |
| 00251 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 18:56 |
| 00264 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-18 18:59 |
| 00253 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 18:59 |
| 00261 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 19:04 |
| 00344 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 19:06 |
| 00358 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 19:13 |
| 00315 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 19:19 |
| 00300 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-18 19:24 |
| 00301 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-18 19:27 |
| 00314 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-18 19:30 |
| 00359 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-18 19:37 |
| 00342 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-18 19:38 |
| 00357 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-18 20:03 |
| 00346 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-18 20:10 |
| 00319 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Jim Melton
|
2008-02-18 20:27 |
| 00331 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Pete Kirkham
|
2008-02-18 20:33 |
| 00379 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-18 22:52 |
| 00388 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-18 22:52 |
| 00389 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Liam Quin
|
2008-02-19 01:01 |
| 00378 |
Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?) |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-19 03:43 |
| 00321 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-19 03:48 |
| 00330 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-19 04:05 |
| 00317 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Philippe Poulard
|
2008-02-19 09:08 |
| 00332 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-19 10:21 |
| 00316 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-19 15:59 |
| 00334 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Tim Bray
|
2008-02-19 19:22 |
| 00390 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Tim Bray
|
2008-02-19 19:31 |
| 00377 |
[xml-dev] XML Grammar [EBNF] |
netbeans.javame.user
|
2008-02-19 19:56 |
| 00376 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-19 19:59 |
| 00391 |
[xml-dev] XML Grammar [EBNF] |
netbeans.javame.user
|
2008-02-19 21:06 |
| 00333 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-19 22:10 |
| 00318 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-19 22:15 |
| 00329 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2008-02-19 23:00 |
| 00320 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-20 02:10 |
| 00355 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Liam Quin
|
2008-02-20 03:28 |
| 00347 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2008-02-20 04:04 |
| 00302 |
[xml-dev] javascript to acces xsl:sort |
S.Kannan
|
2008-02-20 06:56 |
| 00313 |
[xml-dev] javascript to acces xsl:sort |
S.Kannan
|
2008-02-20 06:57 |
| 00312 |
CSS instead of Namespace |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-20 07:49 |
| 00303 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Philippe Poulard
|
2008-02-20 08:54 |
| 00345 |
Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace |
Jirka Kosek
|
2008-02-20 09:28 |
| 00356 |
Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace |
Manos Batsis
|
2008-02-20 10:42 |
| 00343 |
Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-20 13:14 |
| 00360 |
Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-20 13:45 |
| 00385 |
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-20 13:52 |
| 00362 |
[2] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-20 13:59 |
| 00370 |
Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-20 14:08 |
| 00322 |
Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-20 14:10 |
| 00340 |
Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-20 14:19 |
| 00324 |
Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-20 14:32 |
| 00339 |
[3] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-20 14:33 |
| 00368 |
Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-20 14:51 |
| 00386 |
Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace |
James Fuller
|
2008-02-20 15:15 |
| 00373 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-20 15:31 |
| 00384 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-20 15:32 |
| 00297 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-20 15:39 |
| 00306 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-20 15:40 |
| 00354 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-20 15:56 |
| 00352 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-20 16:01 |
| 00363 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-20 16:04 |
| 00294 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-20 16:05 |
| 00305 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Manos Batsis
|
2008-02-20 16:30 |
| 00299 |
XML 2.0 |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-20 17:06 |
| 00307 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-20 17:09 |
| 00311 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-20 18:29 |
| 00292 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Dave Pawson
|
2008-02-20 18:54 |
| 00350 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-20 19:00 |
| 00298 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
David Carver
|
2008-02-20 20:32 |
| 00365 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Felix Sasaki
|
2008-02-20 23:27 |
| 00366 |
Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace |
Felix Sasaki
|
2008-02-21 01:38 |
| 00349 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-21 03:00 |
| 00296 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-21 03:00 |
| 00308 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-21 03:00 |
| 00304 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-21 04:39 |
| 00374 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2008-02-21 04:46 |
| 00338 |
Re[2]: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-21 07:09 |
| 00381 |
[3] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-21 07:19 |
| 00325 |
Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-21 07:59 |
| 00328 |
xml:type (Was: Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?) |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-21 09:48 |
| 00335 |
Re: [xml-dev] [3] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-21 10:08 |
| 00382 |
Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-21 10:56 |
| 00372 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml:type (Was: Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?) |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-21 11:41 |
| 00387 |
[main] Namespace: file with rules instead of tag's prefix (was: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)} |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-21 11:47 |
| 00369 |
file with rules instead of tag's prefix |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-21 12:45 |
| 00327 |
Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-21 13:27 |
| 00336 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-21 14:16 |
| 00383 |
Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2008-02-21 15:17 |
| 00371 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-21 15:39 |
| 00375 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Robin Berjon
|
2008-02-21 16:04 |
| 00380 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-21 16:26 |
| 00364 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
David Carver
|
2008-02-21 16:40 |
| 00337 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2008-02-21 17:37 |
| 00326 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2008-02-21 17:39 |
| 00341 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-21 18:02 |
| 00323 |
Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-21 19:14 |
| 00367 |
Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
James Fuller
|
2008-02-21 19:46 |
| 00348 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2008-02-21 19:52 |
| 00295 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2008-02-21 19:57 |
| 00309 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2008-02-21 20:02 |
| 00310 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2008-02-21 20:03 |
| 00293 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Richard Salz
|
2008-02-21 20:12 |
| 00351 |
Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-21 20:32 |
| 00353 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Felix Sasaki
|
2008-02-21 23:33 |
| 00361 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-21 23:35 |
| 00444 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-22 00:11 |
| 00458 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Champion
|
2008-02-22 05:59 |
| 00415 |
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-22 06:33 |
| 00401 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-22 07:12 |
| 00400 |
Re[4]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-22 07:14 |
| 00414 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-22 09:41 |
| 00459 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-22 10:01 |
| 00442 |
RE: Re[4]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-22 10:14 |
| 00457 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-22 10:29 |
| 00446 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Pete Cordell
|
2008-02-22 10:53 |
| 00431 |
[offtopic] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-22 11:02 |
| 00419 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-22 12:03 |
| 00479 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-22 12:26 |
| 00488 |
RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it? |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-22 14:11 |
| 00489 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Michael Champion
|
2008-02-22 16:45 |
| 00478 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Waters, Michael, Springer US
|
2008-02-22 16:55 |
| 00421 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-22 17:23 |
| 00430 |
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2008-02-22 17:24 |
| 00417 |
Working with Unicode files (was Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?) |
Dan Vint
|
2008-02-22 18:16 |
| 00432 |
RE: [xml-dev] Working with Unicode files (was Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?) |
Waters, Michael, Springer US
|
2008-02-22 18:31 |
| 00416 |
RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Richard Ishida
|
2008-02-22 20:11 |
| 00434 |
RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-22 22:32 |
| 00490 |
RE: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-22 22:51 |
| 00477 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Anne Thomas Manes
|
2008-02-23 01:34 |
| 00476 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-23 03:30 |
| 00491 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-23 04:36 |
| 00433 |
Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?) |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-23 04:52 |
| 00418 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?) |
Liam Quin
|
2008-02-23 05:30 |
| 00429 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Jim Ancona
|
2008-02-23 06:15 |
| 00420 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
COUTHURES Alain
|
2008-02-23 08:36 |
| 00455 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-23 09:49 |
| 00447 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-23 10:05 |
| 00402 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
COUTHURES Alain
|
2008-02-23 10:17 |
| 00413 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Philippe Poulard
|
2008-02-23 11:04 |
| 00412 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-23 14:01 |
| 00403 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-23 14:53 |
| 00445 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-23 15:42 |
| 00456 |
Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Stephen-NHDS
|
2008-02-23 16:40 |
| 00443 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Jim Ancona
|
2008-02-23 16:57 |
| 00460 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-23 17:54 |
| 00485 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-23 18:44 |
| 00470 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-23 23:48 |
| 00422 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?) |
'Liam Quin'
|
2008-02-24 00:35 |
| 00440 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Fraser Goffin
|
2008-02-24 09:48 |
| 00439 |
Optimizing XML performance |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-24 14:46 |
| 00424 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names |
David Carver
|
2008-02-24 15:12 |
| 00468 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names |
Elliotte Harold
|
2008-02-24 17:10 |
| 00486 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2008-02-24 18:39 |
| 00473 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2008-02-24 18:45 |
| 00484 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-24 19:10 |
| 00397 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-24 19:31 |
| 00406 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-24 20:50 |
| 00462 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2008-02-24 23:01 |
| 00454 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-24 23:57 |
| 00452 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-24 23:59 |
| 00463 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
COUTHURES Alain
|
2008-02-25 07:38 |
| 00405 |
Re[6]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace) |
Dmitry Turin
|
2008-02-25 08:57 |
| 00399 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-25 10:45 |
| 00407 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-25 11:10 |
| 00394 |
XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams |
Rob Cameron
|
2008-02-25 13:13 |
| 00411 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-25 13:38 |
| 00392 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-25 13:53 |
| 00450 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-25 14:01 |
| 00404 |
RE: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-25 14:02 |
| 00465 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition? |
Stephen Beller
|
2008-02-25 14:03 |
| 00466 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-25 14:06 |
| 00449 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-25 14:11 |
| 00481 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-25 14:17 |
| 00396 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Eric Bréchemier
|
2008-02-25 14:26 |
| 00408 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-25 14:48 |
| 00398 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-25 14:51 |
| 00474 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-25 14:55 |
| 00438 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2008-02-25 15:50 |
| 00425 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-25 17:24 |
| 00428 |
Re: [xml-dev] Optimizing XML performance |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2008-02-25 17:55 |
| 00435 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams |
Rob Cameron
|
2008-02-25 19:08 |
| 00482 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
"John L. Clark"
|
2008-02-26 01:30 |
| 00472 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
"John L. Clark"
|
2008-02-26 01:32 |
| 00469 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-26 01:43 |
| 00487 |
[xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-26 01:43 |
| 00427 |
Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents |
COUTHURES Alain
|
2008-02-26 07:32 |
| 00436 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-26 11:56 |
| 00483 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-26 13:09 |
| 00471 |
Re: [xml-dev] Optimizing XML performance |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-26 14:19 |
| 00426 |
Resolving XML's Unicode Incompatibility Problem Using "Positional Tagging" |
Stephen Beller
|
2008-02-26 15:16 |
| 00475 |
IDtrust 2008 Program Complete--Last Chance to Register!! |
Dee Schur
|
2008-02-26 15:35 |
| 00480 |
RE: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments' |
Moberg Dale
|
2008-02-26 16:27 |
| 00437 |
Re: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments' |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-26 16:41 |
| 00423 |
RE: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments' |
Moberg Dale
|
2008-02-26 16:59 |
| 00441 |
Re: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments' |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2008-02-26 17:07 |
| 00467 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments' |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-26 18:34 |
| 00448 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
W. E. Perry
|
2008-02-26 19:50 |
| 00393 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
Robert Koberg
|
2008-02-26 20:57 |
| 00395 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-26 21:19 |
| 00409 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-26 21:55 |
| 00410 |
Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2008-02-26 22:14 |
| 00451 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Richard Salz
|
2008-02-27 00:36 |
| 00464 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments' |
Len Bullard
|
2008-02-27 01:29 |
| 00453 |
Re: [xml-dev] Optimizing XML performance |
Mukul Gandhi
|
2008-02-27 06:36 |
| 00461 |
Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-27 08:24 |
| 00520 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-27 09:14 |
| 00527 |
Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
John Snelson
|
2008-02-27 09:36 |
| 00501 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-27 09:41 |
| 00493 |
Accept-Charset and XML declaration? |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-27 11:17 |
| 00494 |
RE: [xml-dev] Accept-Charset and XML declaration? |
Shlomo Yona
|
2008-02-27 12:22 |
| 00500 |
Re: [xml-dev] Accept-Charset and XML declaration? |
bryan rasmussen
|
2008-02-27 12:27 |
| 00528 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Richard Salz
|
2008-02-27 13:40 |
| 00518 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-27 14:06 |
| 00526 |
Re: [xml-dev] Accept-Charset and XML declaration? |
Julian Reschke
|
2008-02-27 14:14 |
| 00522 |
Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
COUTHURES Alain
|
2008-02-27 14:55 |
| 00512 |
XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
Eran Balter
|
2008-02-27 17:04 |
| 00505 |
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
David Carlisle
|
2008-02-27 17:41 |
| 00537 |
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
David Carlisle
|
2008-02-27 17:56 |
| 00541 |
Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Richard Salz
|
2008-02-27 18:07 |
| 00542 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-27 18:21 |
| 00536 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Richard Salz
|
2008-02-27 18:39 |
| 00507 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)
|
2008-02-27 18:45 |
| 00503 |
persisting java object model.. |
dave
|
2008-02-27 19:19 |
| 00511 |
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-27 19:51 |
| 00513 |
Re: [xml-dev] persisting java object model.. |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2008-02-27 20:29 |
| 00502 |
Re: [xml-dev] persisting java object model.. |
Pete Kirkham
|
2008-02-27 21:35 |
| 00515 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-27 21:43 |
| 00543 |
Re: [xml-dev] persisting java object model.. |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-27 22:23 |
| 00535 |
xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default? |
dave
|
2008-02-28 00:57 |
| 00534 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)
|
2008-02-28 02:33 |
| 00544 |
RE: [xml-dev] xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-28 08:36 |
| 00514 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-28 08:40 |
| 00495 |
Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Andrew Welch
|
2008-02-28 10:21 |
| 00504 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-28 10:36 |
| 00496 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)
|
2008-02-28 13:35 |
| 00510 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)
|
2008-02-28 13:36 |
| 00506 |
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
Shlomo Yona
|
2008-02-28 14:35 |
| 00524 |
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
David Carlisle
|
2008-02-28 14:46 |
| 00525 |
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
G. Ken Holman
|
2008-02-28 14:59 |
| 00523 |
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-28 15:00 |
| 00499 |
RE: [xml-dev] xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default? |
dave
|
2008-02-28 19:00 |
| 00521 |
RE: [xml-dev] xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default? |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-28 19:25 |
| 00498 |
Email Validation with Regular Expression |
Benjamin Azan
|
2008-02-28 19:35 |
| 00519 |
Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents |
Dave Pawson
|
2008-02-29 09:00 |
| 00529 |
Press Release - CECID Contributed Self-Service Hermes Messaging Gateway v2.0 (H2O) Testing Server for Free |
Patrick Yee
|
2008-02-29 09:04 |
| 00539 |
Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Philippe Poulard
|
2008-02-29 09:16 |
| 00532 |
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-29 09:23 |
| 00508 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-29 09:28 |
| 00517 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)
|
2008-02-29 13:32 |
| 00516 |
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-29 15:04 |
| 00509 |
Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2008-02-29 16:28 |
| 00531 |
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-29 16:46 |
| 00540 |
OASIS XACML InterOp Demo, RSA 2008, San Francisco, California, USA, April 7-11 2008 |
Dee Schur
|
2008-02-29 18:14 |
| 00533 |
Schema for unordered elements, with additional requirements |
Robert Hall
|
2008-02-29 18:51 |
| 00538 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-29 19:20 |
| 00492 |
RE: [xml-dev] Schema for unordered elements, with additional requirements |
Michael Kay
|
2008-02-29 19:31 |
| 00497 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)
|
2008-02-29 20:08 |
| 00530 |
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0) |
Richard Salz
|
2008-02-29 20:32 |
