xml-dev

← back

138 messages · 42 threads

# Subject From Date
00030 [Announce] XQuery Training Event Stylus Studio 2008-03-03 19:17
00028 Early-Bird Discount Expires Soon for the Open Standards Symposium Jane Harnad 2008-03-03 20:26
00032 New Release of Yax - a Java XProc (XML Pipeline) Implementation: First Maven based Release [email protected] 2008-03-04 12:59
00008 "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle? Costello, Roger L. 2008-03-05 12:01
00006 RE: [xml-dev] "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle? Meadows, Philip 2008-03-05 12:05
00009 RE: [xml-dev] "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle? Michael Kay 2008-03-05 12:39
00002 Re: [xml-dev] "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle? bryan rasmussen 2008-03-05 12:40
00013 Re: [xml-dev] "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle? bryan rasmussen 2008-03-05 12:42
00000 Re: [xml-dev] "Maximize the ratio of content to markup" What's the underlying principle? David Carlisle 2008-03-05 12:49
00026 consuming XML document in web service Robert Hoenig 2008-03-05 17:37
00034 Re: [xml-dev] consuming XML document in web service Pete Cordell 2008-03-06 10:27
00035 Re: [xml-dev] consuming XML document in web service Michael Champion 2008-03-06 14:38
00025 RE: [xml-dev] consuming XML document in web service Robert Hoenig 2008-03-06 14:44
00004 [ANN] EditiX XML Editor 2008 - Service Pack 1 Alexandre Brillant 2008-03-07 14:02
00010 Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To? Costello, Roger L. 2008-03-09 11:45
00005 Re: [xml-dev] Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To? Pete Cordell 2008-03-09 12:20
00007 "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Costello, Roger L. 2008-03-09 12:49
00040 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Fraser Goffin 2008-03-09 13:04
00043 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) bryan rasmussen 2008-03-09 14:37
00022 Re: [xml-dev] Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To? Manfred Staudinger 2008-03-09 14:37
00015 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Mukul Gandhi 2008-03-09 17:37
00018 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) bryan rasmussen 2008-03-09 20:38
00019 Re: [xml-dev] Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To? Liam Quin 2008-03-09 23:58
00044 Re: [xml-dev] Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To? Ken North 2008-03-10 02:07
00039 DataServices World Call for Speakers Closes March 15 Ken North 2008-03-10 02:12
00046 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Rick Jelliffe 2008-03-10 06:48
00037 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) James Fuller 2008-03-10 07:38
00017 Re: [xml-dev] Can Searchbots Find Web Pages That Aren't Linked To? bryan rasmussen 2008-03-10 07:43
00020 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Michael Kay 2008-03-10 10:04
00045 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Mukul Gandhi 2008-03-10 17:02
00042 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Xia Li 2008-03-10 17:43
00038 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Xia Li 2008-03-10 17:58
00041 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Mukul Gandhi 2008-03-10 18:09
00021 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Xia Li 2008-03-10 18:22
00016 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Michael Kay 2008-03-10 18:41
00023 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Dimitri Glazkov 2008-03-10 18:47
00014 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Richard Salz 2008-03-10 18:56
00036 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) [email protected] 2008-03-10 19:16
00024 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Len Bullard 2008-03-10 21:24
00003 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Elliotte Harold 2008-03-11 03:31
00011 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Costello, Roger L. 2008-03-11 13:17
00012 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) W. E. Perry 2008-03-11 14:46
00001 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) W. E. Perry 2008-03-11 16:50
00027 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Len Bullard 2008-03-11 17:27
00029 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Robin Cover 2008-03-11 18:46
00031 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) Michael Kay 2008-03-11 19:07
00033 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Len Bullard 2008-03-11 19:24
00106 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) bryan rasmussen 2008-03-11 19:35
00095 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Len Bullard 2008-03-11 20:32
00066 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Len Bullard 2008-03-11 20:49
00053 Objects at REST... Andrzej Jan Taramina 2008-03-12 12:28
00054 Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Alexander Johannesen 2008-03-12 12:53
00065 Re: [xml-dev] Objects at REST... Peter Hunsberger 2008-03-12 14:29
00107 Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Elliotte Harold 2008-03-12 14:41
00093 RE: [xml-dev] Objects at REST... Len Bullard 2008-03-12 17:27
00105 Re: [xml-dev] Objects at REST... Peter Hunsberger 2008-03-12 17:41
00082 Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Mark Baker 2008-03-12 21:02
00125 Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Andrzej Jan Taramina 2008-03-12 21:42
00070 Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Andrzej Jan Taramina 2008-03-12 21:42
00097 Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Andrzej Jan Taramina 2008-03-12 21:42
00134 Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Andrzej Jan Taramina 2008-03-12 21:42
00135 Re: [xml-dev] Objects at REST... Andrzej Jan Taramina 2008-03-12 21:42
00124 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" (Is this a paradox?) W. E. Perry 2008-03-12 23:01
00072 Re: [xml-dev] Objects at REST... Rick Jelliffe 2008-03-13 08:39
00081 should this be well-formed? bryan rasmussen 2008-03-13 09:05
00068 Re: [xml-dev] Objects at REST... Rick Jelliffe 2008-03-13 09:16
00083 Re: [xml-dev] should this be well-formed? John Snelson 2008-03-13 10:50
00067 Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Alexander Johannesen 2008-03-13 11:16
00085 Re: [xml-dev] should this be well-formed? bryan rasmussen 2008-03-13 11:45
00136 RE: [xml-dev] Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Michael Kay 2008-03-13 11:53
00123 Summer of Code at the FLWOR foundation William Candillon 2008-03-13 12:18
00122 Re: [xml-dev] should this be well-formed? Pete Cordell 2008-03-13 12:24
00137 Re: [xml-dev] should this be well-formed? Jirka Kosek 2008-03-13 12:32
00084 Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Steve Bjorg 2008-03-13 12:52
00069 Re: [xml-dev] should this be well-formed? bryan rasmussen 2008-03-13 13:03
00103 Re: [xml-dev] Objects at REST... Peter Hunsberger 2008-03-13 14:25
00080 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Peter Hunsberger 2008-03-13 14:31
00071 Re: [xml-dev] Objects at REST... Rick Jelliffe 2008-03-13 14:57
00098 Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax Stephen Beller 2008-03-13 16:40
00064 RE: Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax Len Bullard 2008-03-13 19:07
00055 RE: [xml-dev] Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST... Len Bullard 2008-03-13 19:15
00056 RE: Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax Stephen Beller 2008-03-13 19:29
00063 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Len Bullard 2008-03-13 19:34
00096 RE: Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax Len Bullard 2008-03-13 20:51
00104 RE: Beyond Tagged to "Spatial" Syntax Stephen Beller 2008-03-13 21:12
00094 RE: Objects at REST... Andrzej Jan Taramina 2008-03-14 14:13
00108 Announcement: XML API Distance Course at University Level Jonas Mellin 2008-03-16 01:12
00131 Re: [xml-dev] Announcement: XML API Distance Course at University Level Greg Stasko 2008-03-16 01:59
00116 Re: [xml-dev] Announcement: XML API Distance Course at University Level Jonas Mellin 2008-03-16 08:47
00073 Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron? Costello, Roger L. 2008-03-16 11:51
00091 Re: [xml-dev] Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron? Liam Quin 2008-03-16 15:26
00090 RE: [xml-dev] Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron? Costello, Roger L. 2008-03-16 16:43
00075 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Steve Newcomb 2008-03-16 16:54
00114 RE: [xml-dev] Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron? Michael Kay 2008-03-16 16:59
00132 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Len 2008-03-16 17:27
00119 RE: [xml-dev] Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron? Michael Kay 2008-03-16 19:02
00130 Re: [xml-dev] Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron? 'Liam Quin' 2008-03-16 19:46
00050 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Steve Newcomb 2008-03-16 20:42
00059 Re: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) James Fuller 2008-03-17 06:37
00109 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Len Bullard 2008-03-17 16:51
00102 Call for Speaker(s) on Microformats/Semantic Web for Open Web 2008 Vancouver Conf @ Apr/14+15 Gerald Bauer 2008-03-18 01:40
00101 RE: [xml-dev] "XML is just syntax" versus "Use semantic markup" ( Is this a paradox?) Len 2008-03-18 03:19
00110 Balisage papers due in ONE MONTH! B Tommie Usdin 2008-03-18 15:37
00058 [xml-dev Announcement]: XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0.1 Yves Zoundi 2008-03-19 00:54
00052 Re: [xml-dev] [xml-dev Announcement]: XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0.1 Ruben Trancoso 2008-03-19 01:49
00060 datatype aware schematron with xslt2 query binding issue Paul Hermans 2008-03-19 14:42
00048 Re: [xml-dev] datatype aware schematron with xslt2 query binding issue David Carlisle 2008-03-19 14:56
00062 Re: [xml-dev] Were these derived from a logical data model: XSLT, XML Schema, XHTML, Schematron? [email protected] 2008-03-20 10:53
00047 [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released John Snelson 2008-03-21 00:21
00100 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released Fabrice Desré - France Telecom DR&D/MA PS/AMS 2008-03-21 08:17
00111 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released John Snelson 2008-03-21 09:09
00112 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released Michael Kay 2008-03-21 09:42
00099 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released [email protected] 2008-03-21 09:53
00049 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released John Snelson 2008-03-21 09:55
00061 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Fast XML Pull Parser 0.3 released John Snelson 2008-03-21 10:53
00051 xml.com Jonathan Robie 2008-03-25 20:31
00057 Re: [xml-dev] xml.com W. E. Perry 2008-03-25 20:51
00120 Re: [xml-dev] xml.com Kurt Cagle 2008-03-25 22:46
00127 XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types Costello, Roger L. 2008-03-26 11:17
00089 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types Andrew Welch 2008-03-26 12:04
00076 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types bryan rasmussen 2008-03-26 12:21
00079 [ANN] Apache FOP 0.95beta Released Jonathan Robie 2008-03-26 13:33
00086 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types Michael Kay 2008-03-26 13:41
00128 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types bryan rasmussen 2008-03-26 14:05
00118 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types Jonathan Robie 2008-03-26 15:24
00133 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types Michael Kay 2008-03-26 22:47
00115 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types Jonathan Robie 2008-03-27 15:35
00078 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema Design: no local elements with anonymous types Michael Kay 2008-03-27 16:06
00087 [ANN] XSL-FO 2.0 requirements published Liam Quin 2008-03-28 01:28
00129 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] XSL-FO 2.0 requirements published bryan rasmussen 2008-03-28 06:01
00117 XML Pipelines list? bryan rasmussen 2008-03-28 07:32
00121 Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipelines list? [email protected] 2008-03-28 10:37
00126 CFP: RuleML-2008 (2008 International RuleML Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications) Adrian Paschke 2008-03-28 13:52
00088 Best Practice for adding a "standard data item" to pre-existing XML vocabularies? Costello, Roger L. 2008-03-28 15:24
00077 [ANN] FoX_4.0 - Fully validating XML toolkit for Fortran Toby White 2008-03-28 17:14
00092 Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipelines list? Steve Ball 2008-03-28 22:56
00074 Does a XSD schema define the minimum or maximum structure of an XML doc? Ben Stover 2008-03-31 18:26
00113 Re: [xml-dev] Does a XSD schema define the minimum or maximum structure of an XML doc? Pete Cordell 2008-03-31 21:48