| 00083 |
JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-02 13:53 |
| 00084 |
RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-02 14:02 |
| 00074 |
Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException |
Robert Koberg
|
2009-01-02 14:11 |
| 00024 |
RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-02 15:05 |
| 00033 |
Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-04 10:57 |
| 00021 |
RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-04 15:13 |
| 00034 |
Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-05 02:37 |
| 00020 |
RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-05 11:19 |
| 00036 |
Announce: XML Prague 2009 Last Call for Papers |
Jirka Kosek
|
2009-01-05 22:30 |
| 00085 |
Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents |
Cecil New
|
2009-01-06 13:09 |
| 00073 |
Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerException (newbie) |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-06 13:24 |
| 00072 |
[Announce] XQilla 2.2.0 released |
John Snelson
|
2009-01-06 15:16 |
| 00086 |
Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents |
John Snelson
|
2009-01-06 15:27 |
| 00035 |
RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-06 15:40 |
| 00022 |
RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerException (newbie) |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-06 15:44 |
| 00032 |
RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-06 16:23 |
| 00023 |
RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-06 16:37 |
| 00054 |
Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents |
Richard Salz
|
2009-01-06 22:08 |
| 00046 |
Re: Metalink XML Download Description Format (draft-bryan-metalink-01) |
Anthony Bryan
|
2009-01-07 02:26 |
| 00008 |
Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents |
John Snelson
|
2009-01-07 10:13 |
| 00019 |
XML Technologies You Need For XML Workflow-Based Applications |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-07 14:22 |
| 00018 |
Validating Compound Documents using NVDL |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-08 20:02 |
| 00009 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validating Compound Documents using NVDL |
bryan rasmussen
|
2009-01-09 11:31 |
| 00045 |
XML Schema Incompatibilities with Data Binding Tools |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-09 19:51 |
| 00055 |
What makes a data component good for standardizing? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-10 14:34 |
| 00044 |
RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing? |
Len
|
2009-01-10 16:48 |
| 00056 |
Announce: XML Prague 2009 CFP extended until Jan 16 |
Jirka Kosek
|
2009-01-12 22:40 |
| 00080 |
XSLT Stylesheet query (newbie) |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-12 22:53 |
| 00066 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet query (newbie) |
Robert Koberg
|
2009-01-12 23:06 |
| 00025 |
RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing? |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-01-14 01:40 |
| 00042 |
A good XML editor for documents? |
Gustaf Liljegren
|
2009-01-14 12:37 |
| 00041 |
RE: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents? |
Laurens van den Oever
|
2009-01-14 13:37 |
| 00027 |
Re: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents? |
George Cristian Bina
|
2009-01-14 14:04 |
| 00064 |
RE: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents? |
Liz Andrews
|
2009-01-14 14:56 |
| 00081 |
Widget versioning - the widget, the spec, the platform api |
Andrew Welch
|
2009-01-15 10:53 |
| 00069 |
RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-15 11:27 |
| 00079 |
RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing? |
nico
|
2009-01-15 12:51 |
| 00005 |
Serialization with SAX |
Johannes Lichtenberger
|
2009-01-15 21:29 |
| 00012 |
RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-15 22:03 |
| 00058 |
RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX |
Johannes Lichtenberger
|
2009-01-15 23:41 |
| 00053 |
RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX |
Johannes Lichtenberger
|
2009-01-15 23:49 |
| 00051 |
Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-17 13:42 |
| 00059 |
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2009-01-17 15:45 |
| 00011 |
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
Robert Koberg
|
2009-01-17 16:11 |
| 00007 |
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2009-01-17 16:36 |
| 00013 |
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
Robert Koberg
|
2009-01-17 17:13 |
| 00002 |
Norbert Mikula |
[email protected]
|
2009-01-17 17:28 |
| 00017 |
RESTful, Secure, Non-SSL Authentication |
Robert Koberg
|
2009-01-17 17:46 |
| 00000 |
RE: [xml-dev] Norbert Mikula |
[email protected]
|
2009-01-17 20:51 |
| 00049 |
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2009-01-17 22:07 |
| 00061 |
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
Chin Chee-Kai
|
2009-01-19 02:41 |
| 00062 |
Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
Fraser Goffin
|
2009-01-19 09:17 |
| 00048 |
RE: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-19 18:40 |
| 00004 |
B2MML schemas and definition of Equipment Classes |
Marcello Urgo
|
2009-01-19 22:00 |
| 00014 |
RE: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user" |
CHET ENSIGN, BLOOMBERG/ B-LAW
|
2009-01-20 14:34 |
| 00006 |
XSLT Stylesheet test for special character |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-21 02:04 |
| 00010 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet test for special character |
Bjoern Hoehrmann
|
2009-01-21 02:31 |
| 00070 |
RE: [xml-dev] Norbert Mikula |
Michael Champion
|
2009-01-21 03:50 |
| 00076 |
[ANN] Axl Library 0.5.6 'Bohemian like you' release is ready! |
Francis Brosnan Blazquez
|
2009-01-21 11:21 |
| 00040 |
Validate an instance document that has a replaceable data component, specified by a taxonomy |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-21 17:36 |
| 00028 |
Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-22 12:26 |
| 00031 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
nico
|
2009-01-22 12:41 |
| 00037 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet test for special character |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-22 12:56 |
| 00077 |
Re: [xml-dev] B2MML schemas and definition of Equipment Classes |
nico
|
2009-01-22 12:58 |
| 00068 |
XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-22 13:01 |
| 00082 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
David Carlisle
|
2009-01-22 13:07 |
| 00065 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet test for special character |
nico
|
2009-01-22 13:08 |
| 00030 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-01-22 13:14 |
| 00038 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-22 13:31 |
| 00078 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
Robert Koberg
|
2009-01-22 14:01 |
| 00067 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
Micah Dubinko
|
2009-01-22 18:25 |
| 00071 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
Andrew Welch
|
2009-01-22 20:51 |
| 00075 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
David Orchard
|
2009-01-22 20:54 |
| 00039 |
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
Len
|
2009-01-22 23:53 |
| 00029 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
Robert Koberg
|
2009-01-23 00:04 |
| 00043 |
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-01-23 01:04 |
| 00026 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
[email protected]
|
2009-01-23 04:04 |
| 00063 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Incompatibilities with Data Binding Tools |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2009-01-23 06:53 |
| 00047 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
DavePawson
|
2009-01-23 07:59 |
| 00003 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-23 08:56 |
| 00015 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
nico
|
2009-01-23 09:01 |
| 00016 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2009-01-23 09:28 |
| 00001 |
[ANN] XMLmind XSL-FO Converter 4.3 released |
Olivier Ishacian
|
2009-01-23 09:31 |
| 00050 |
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-23 09:50 |
| 00060 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-23 10:00 |
| 00052 |
Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
nico
|
2009-01-23 10:08 |
| 00057 |
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-23 10:15 |
| 00114 |
RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-23 11:12 |
| 00121 |
Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-23 16:11 |
| 00095 |
RE: [xml-dev] Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-23 16:44 |
| 00088 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-23 20:58 |
| 00089 |
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype |
[email protected]
|
2009-01-25 22:44 |
| 00094 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-26 13:25 |
| 00122 |
XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-26 13:30 |
| 00112 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results? |
David Carlisle
|
2009-01-26 13:35 |
| 00120 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
David Carlisle
|
2009-01-26 13:43 |
| 00116 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-26 13:54 |
| 00106 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-27 13:03 |
| 00099 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-27 13:06 |
| 00130 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-27 13:13 |
| 00134 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-28 13:04 |
| 00135 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-28 13:27 |
| 00129 |
XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits of namespace modularity |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-28 13:34 |
| 00101 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits of namespace modularity |
George Cristian Bina
|
2009-01-28 13:51 |
| 00105 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits of namespace modularity |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-28 14:08 |
| 00097 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits of namespace modularity |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-28 14:11 |
| 00107 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits of namespace modularity |
George Cristian Bina
|
2009-01-28 14:29 |
| 00096 |
Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-28 16:11 |
| 00109 |
Re: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Robert Koberg
|
2009-01-28 16:20 |
| 00136 |
RE: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Jim Wilson
|
2009-01-28 16:31 |
| 00128 |
RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-28 17:09 |
| 00127 |
Re: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Frank Manola
|
2009-01-28 18:37 |
| 00137 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Paul Spencer
|
2009-01-28 23:51 |
| 00108 |
RE: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Len
|
2009-01-29 00:56 |
| 00098 |
RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-29 13:07 |
| 00104 |
[ANN] XML Prague final program announced |
Jim Fuller
|
2009-01-29 14:01 |
| 00100 |
[Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-29 14:15 |
| 00118 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Frank Manola
|
2009-01-29 16:15 |
| 00117 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Jim Wilson
|
2009-01-29 16:41 |
| 00090 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Paul Spencer
|
2009-01-29 16:45 |
| 00093 |
Same element, different type |
Keith Hassen
|
2009-01-29 19:12 |
| 00092 |
Re: [xml-dev] Same element, different type |
George Cristian Bina
|
2009-01-29 19:58 |
| 00091 |
Re: [Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Marcus Carr
|
2009-01-29 23:00 |
| 00115 |
RE: [xml-dev] Same element, different type |
Michael Kay
|
2009-01-29 23:17 |
| 00119 |
Re: [Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Marcus Carr
|
2009-01-30 00:28 |
| 00113 |
RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing? |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-01-30 01:01 |
| 00123 |
Fw: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
Jack Bush
|
2009-01-30 12:58 |
| 00132 |
Re: Fw: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?) |
David Carlisle
|
2009-01-30 13:15 |
| 00125 |
RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-30 13:32 |
| 00102 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
James Fuller
|
2009-01-30 14:04 |
| 00111 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2009-01-30 15:23 |
| 00110 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Frank Manola
|
2009-01-30 16:11 |
| 00103 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Jim Wilson
|
2009-01-30 21:20 |
| 00124 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-01-31 01:42 |
| 00133 |
xml 1.0 document declaration question. |
Me Myself and I
|
2009-01-31 11:09 |
| 00126 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml 1.0 document declaration question. |
Jesper Tverskov
|
2009-01-31 11:48 |
| 00131 |
Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-01-31 13:16 |
| 00087 |
Attention! Your PayPal account was limited! |
Service Paypal
|
2009-01-31 19:30 |
