| 00009 |
Re: [xml-dev] Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Fraser Goffin
|
2009-02-01 12:53 |
| 00033 |
RE: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-01 18:34 |
| 00031 |
Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Marcus Carr
|
2009-02-01 23:59 |
| 00029 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-02 09:46 |
| 00034 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Paul Spencer
|
2009-02-02 11:05 |
| 00008 |
Schematron XQuery binding |
bryan rasmussen
|
2009-02-02 11:31 |
| 00006 |
The beauty and power of declarative syntaxes and declarative programming languages |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-02 13:26 |
| 00010 |
Re: [xml-dev] The beauty and power of declarative syntaxes and declarative programming languages |
Jonas Mellin
|
2009-02-02 14:31 |
| 00002 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-02-02 15:54 |
| 00014 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2009-02-02 17:13 |
| 00000 |
Re: [xml-dev] The beauty and power of declarative syntaxes and declarative programming languages |
Dimitre Novatchev
|
2009-02-02 17:54 |
| 00027 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-02 18:14 |
| 00036 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-02-02 20:07 |
| 00037 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2009-02-02 20:43 |
| 00026 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Keith Hassen
|
2009-02-02 20:54 |
| 00004 |
XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-02 21:03 |
| 00011 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Alan CANNON
|
2009-02-02 21:10 |
| 00005 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Robert Koberg
|
2009-02-02 21:24 |
| 00007 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Frank Manola
|
2009-02-02 21:27 |
| 00042 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Alan CANNON
|
2009-02-02 21:35 |
| 00045 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2009-02-02 21:39 |
| 00023 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-02 21:39 |
| 00016 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2009-02-02 21:40 |
| 00019 |
RE: [xml-dev] Purpose of XML (was: irrelevant title) |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-02 21:56 |
| 00020 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-02-03 00:05 |
| 00046 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-02-03 01:04 |
| 00041 |
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-03 08:41 |
| 00048 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-03 13:12 |
| 00039 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-03 13:40 |
| 00018 |
SAX |
Johannes Lichtenberger
|
2009-02-03 13:50 |
| 00021 |
RE: [xml-dev] SAX |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-03 14:01 |
| 00047 |
SAX - not well formed data |
Johannes Lichtenberger
|
2009-02-03 14:01 |
| 00040 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2009-02-03 14:34 |
| 00043 |
RE: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-03 14:39 |
| 00044 |
RE: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data |
Johannes Lichtenberger
|
2009-02-03 15:49 |
| 00022 |
RE: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-03 15:57 |
| 00017 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate? |
Peter Hunsberger
|
2009-02-03 17:55 |
| 00024 |
any-to-any structure transformations article |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 19:05 |
| 00015 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Marcus Carr
|
2009-02-03 23:33 |
| 00038 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-03 23:55 |
| 00025 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Marcus Carr
|
2009-02-04 00:11 |
| 00003 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data |
Manos Batsis
|
2009-02-04 09:04 |
| 00012 |
RE: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-04 10:00 |
| 00013 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data |
Manos Batsis
|
2009-02-04 10:08 |
| 00001 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?] |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-04 12:50 |
| 00028 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-04 12:53 |
| 00035 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-04 13:26 |
| 00030 |
ANN: Altova MissionKit v2009 |
Liz Andrews
|
2009-02-04 16:05 |
| 00032 |
[ANN] CodeSynthesis XSD/e 3.0.0 released |
Boris Kolpackov
|
2009-02-05 07:53 |
| 00101 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-05 12:29 |
| 00115 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-05 15:07 |
| 00072 |
[ANN] Xml Schema Lightener 2.0 utility: making schemas simpler |
Paul Kiel
|
2009-02-05 15:08 |
| 00057 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-05 19:23 |
| 00058 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-05 22:23 |
| 00071 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-06 03:02 |
| 00116 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-06 09:21 |
| 00099 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL2.0 stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-06 13:46 |
| 00114 |
XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-09 10:17 |
| 00103 |
RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-09 10:35 |
| 00088 |
keyword search over XML streams |
Maciej Gawinecki
|
2009-02-09 14:42 |
| 00076 |
A bad idea to use the XML Schema list type? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-09 15:10 |
| 00136 |
RE: [xml-dev] A bad idea to use the XML Schema list type? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-09 15:25 |
| 00145 |
Re: [xml-dev] A bad idea to use the XML Schema list type? |
David Carlisle
|
2009-02-09 15:37 |
| 00146 |
RE: [xml-dev] A bad idea to use the XML Schema list type? |
Rushforth, Peter
|
2009-02-09 15:50 |
| 00135 |
XML representation of SQL queries? |
Richard Tobin
|
2009-02-09 16:03 |
| 00078 |
[xml-dev] XML representation of SQL queries? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 23:58 |
| 00087 |
DOM level 1 java parsers? |
Keith Hassen
|
2009-02-10 22:16 |
| 00074 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML representation of SQL queries? |
nico
|
2009-02-11 10:50 |
| 00089 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML representation of SQL queries? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-11 11:27 |
| 00073 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-11 22:06 |
| 00091 |
Schema fragments form style sheets? |
Christian Mahnke
|
2009-02-12 09:48 |
| 00147 |
RE: [xml-dev] Schema fragments form style sheets? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-12 09:59 |
| 00134 |
Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments form style sheets? |
Christian Mahnke
|
2009-02-12 12:49 |
| 00133 |
3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-14 22:40 |
| 00090 |
xmllint |
Johannes Lichtenberger
|
2009-02-14 23:00 |
| 00148 |
RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-14 23:04 |
| 00075 |
RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-14 23:09 |
| 00086 |
Re: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-14 23:22 |
| 00077 |
RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-15 12:58 |
| 00112 |
RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-15 14:17 |
| 00104 |
RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-15 15:46 |
| 00059 |
[Announce] Expanded syllabus now includes XQuery in March European training at XML Prague |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-16 13:41 |
| 00070 |
python and xacml |
Oguz Yarimtepe
|
2009-02-16 18:57 |
| 00069 |
Email about the apartment |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-16 18:59 |
| 00060 |
Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-16 21:39 |
| 00102 |
Re: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance? |
B Tommie Usdin
|
2009-02-16 22:02 |
| 00113 |
Re: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance? |
Frank Manola
|
2009-02-16 23:30 |
| 00100 |
RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-16 23:53 |
| 00117 |
Re: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance? |
Frank Manola
|
2009-02-17 00:19 |
| 00142 |
Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions |
Jack Bush
|
2009-02-17 12:51 |
| 00127 |
RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-17 13:11 |
| 00079 |
RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance? |
Crawford, Mark
|
2009-02-17 20:37 |
| 00097 |
Using xsd:list and getting data from xml file |
liam mail
|
2009-02-18 18:34 |
| 00096 |
XML Conferences in 2009? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-18 22:17 |
| 00081 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
Daniel Grossberg
|
2009-02-18 23:08 |
| 00125 |
ANNOUNCE: MarkLogic User Conference 2009 |
Micah Dubinko
|
2009-02-18 23:34 |
| 00143 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
James Fuller
|
2009-02-18 23:46 |
| 00130 |
RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance? |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-02-19 00:37 |
| 00141 |
RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-02-19 00:47 |
| 00054 |
I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine |
Santhosh T
|
2009-02-19 01:07 |
| 00063 |
RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance? |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-02-19 01:29 |
| 00119 |
RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-19 01:32 |
| 00111 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
Kurt Cagle
|
2009-02-19 01:33 |
| 00109 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
Piotr Bański
|
2009-02-19 02:23 |
| 00120 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
Kurt Cagle
|
2009-02-19 05:41 |
| 00062 |
Re: [xml-dev] Using xsd:list and getting data from xml file |
liam mail
|
2009-02-19 12:50 |
| 00056 |
RE: 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-19 15:12 |
| 00064 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2009-02-19 15:50 |
| 00051 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-19 15:51 |
| 00068 |
RE: [xml-dev] Using xsd:list and getting data from xml file |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-19 16:03 |
| 00049 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-19 16:04 |
| 00107 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-19 16:33 |
| 00122 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-19 16:39 |
| 00123 |
RE: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-19 16:58 |
| 00106 |
There's still time to sign up for the next tools neutral free webinar |
Sharon Burton
|
2009-02-19 17:32 |
| 00053 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-19 18:35 |
| 00065 |
Re: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine |
Santhosh T
|
2009-02-19 19:17 |
| 00055 |
Identifying markup using namespaces versus using data (was: 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach) |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-19 19:26 |
| 00061 |
RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-02-19 22:02 |
| 00131 |
[ANN] XML Prague 2009 March 21-22, only one month to go ... register now |
Jim Fuller
|
2009-02-20 08:54 |
| 00138 |
RE: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-20 14:15 |
| 00095 |
Re: Hello,Kseniya here. |
liam mail
|
2009-02-20 15:23 |
| 00082 |
Re: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine |
Philippe Poulard
|
2009-02-20 16:25 |
| 00085 |
Re: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine |
Santhosh T
|
2009-02-20 16:44 |
| 00092 |
RE: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-20 16:51 |
| 00139 |
Re: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine |
Philippe Poulard
|
2009-02-20 17:14 |
| 00129 |
RE: Identifying markup using namespaces versus using data (was: 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach) |
Cox, Bruce
|
2009-02-20 19:20 |
| 00144 |
ANN: XProc Tutorial |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-21 13:39 |
| 00126 |
Remove Nodes But Keep Children |
David
|
2009-02-22 00:38 |
| 00084 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remove Nodes But Keep Children |
David
|
2009-02-22 00:45 |
| 00093 |
[Summary] 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-22 13:37 |
| 00140 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remove Nodes But Keep Children |
nico
|
2009-02-23 11:16 |
| 00128 |
Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-25 11:38 |
| 00132 |
Re: [xml-dev] Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
Chris Burdess
|
2009-02-25 11:46 |
| 00137 |
RE: [xml-dev] Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-25 12:17 |
| 00094 |
Re: [xml-dev] Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-25 13:11 |
| 00083 |
Re: [xml-dev] Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
Richard Salz
|
2009-02-25 15:40 |
| 00098 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009? |
Ken North
|
2009-02-25 20:11 |
| 00080 |
RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2009-02-26 00:03 |
| 00124 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-26 00:22 |
| 00105 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
Richard Salz
|
2009-02-26 01:40 |
| 00052 |
Calls for Participation -- Balisage & Processing XML Symposium |
B Tommie Usdin
|
2009-02-26 02:20 |
| 00066 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-26 09:03 |
| 00067 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
Michael Kay
|
2009-02-26 09:10 |
| 00050 |
Twitterers |
Elliotte Harold
|
2009-02-26 13:18 |
| 00108 |
RE: [xml-dev] Twitterers |
Joe Fawcett
|
2009-02-26 13:43 |
| 00121 |
RE: [xml-dev] Twitterers |
Liz Andrews
|
2009-02-26 15:10 |
| 00110 |
Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 15:40 |
| 00118 |
[ann] oXygen XML Editor 10.1 - new XML Schema diagram and documentation |
George Cristian Bina
|
2009-02-26 16:09 |
| 00155 |
Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers |
David Orchard
|
2009-02-26 17:40 |
| 00158 |
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"? |
G. Ken Holman
|
2009-02-26 18:19 |
| 00152 |
Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers |
Don Demsak
|
2009-02-26 19:11 |
| 00149 |
Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers |
Kurt Cagle
|
2009-02-26 19:15 |
| 00150 |
[Ann] SketchPath Tool - Now available as Word2007 Addin |
Philip Fearon
|
2009-02-26 22:12 |
| 00151 |
RE: [xml-dev] Twitterers |
Len
|
2009-02-26 23:51 |
| 00159 |
Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers |
Michael Hahn
|
2009-02-27 03:09 |
| 00154 |
XDR to XSD converter? |
Karol Zielonko
|
2009-02-27 03:48 |
| 00157 |
Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers |
John Kemp
|
2009-02-27 20:53 |
| 00156 |
"vocabulary constraints" and other constraints (was: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?) |
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
|
2009-02-28 02:34 |
| 00153 |
Re: [xml-dev] "vocabulary constraints" and other constraints (was: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?) |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2009-02-28 02:53 |
