Pete Cordell schrieb:
> Original Message From: "Tim Bray"
>> the elements would have names like <org.tbray.donkeys.father> and
>> <org.tbray.donkeys.birth-date> and so on. And if this were being
>> used by IETF when we did atom, the tags would be like
>> <org.ietf.atom.feed> and <org.ietf.atom.entry>.
>
> Non-reversed still works better for me, i.e.:
>
> <father.donkeys.tbray.org>
> <birth-date.donkeys.tbray.org>
> <feed.atom.ietf.org>
> <entry.atom.ietf.org>
At least this way, for LTR readers, which I believe largely
majoritarian, the local part, which is likely to be less
redundant than the namespace part, stands out.
However, I find that, reversed or not, the repetition of the
redundant namespace part constitutes a major tedium and does
not positively contribute to readability.
--
Michael Ludwig
