Original Message From: "Liam Quin"
> Donkeys can't type very fast... I can see there there might be pushback
> for this proposal on the grounds that it's considerably more verbose
> than most other current proposals, with the exception of the {...}
> syntax...
See my proposal from yesterday that allowed partial namespaces
(http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200908/msg00033.html ).
> also, it can't easily be made compatible with
> things like ch.cern.html (later org.ietf.html, and then org.w3.html,
> of course, and also ch.iso.html...)
If you make the namespace more obviously separable from the local name, (for
example, by using a : rather than another .), then the XML parser can be
informed as a local implementation that namespace org.ietf.html is an alias
of namespace org.w3.html (or better still, namespace html.ietf.org is an
alias of namespace html.w3.org). So when the parser encounters
<body:html.ietf.org> it can return the equivalent of <body:html.w3.org>.
Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using XML C++
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info
