RE: [xml-dev] Wikipedia on XML

> 
> No, I don't think that's sufficient. FDTDs are fundamentally 
> integrated into the design of an XML parser. They are not 
> optional pieces one can ignore. Nor are they just a schema 
> language either.


For the average reader of this article, DTDs and XSDs are equally likely to
be important (or unimportant) to them.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay