Michael Kay schrieb:
>> I suggest we add a section on DTDs and validity rather than
>> merging it in with other schema languages. For better or
>> worse--probably worse, the XML specs do specially preference
>> DTDs over other schema languages.
>
> A better approach might be to treat DTDs in the structure of the
> article as co-equal with other schema languages, and mention in the
> prose that for historical reasons they are given a special status in
> the XML recommendation. That's a better reflection of the reality of
> usage.
All schemas are equal, but the DTD is more equal than others. (XML Farm)
--
Michael Ludwig
