I was not asking about the difference between the two approaches, I was
asking about the difference between anecdote and evidence. It is
interesting that my message, which I thought was completely clear and
included a quotation from you;
> > There is no evidence to support one approach or the other. There are
> > anecdotes, but that's not evidence.
>
> I do not understand the difference, can you explain?
Was not at all clear to you, as can be seen by your edit:
> > I do not understand the difference [between the two approaches
> that were listed], can you explain?
There are probably some interesting lessons to be learned their, and they
might be applicable in what seems to me the attempt to drive all ambiguity
out of XML-related specifications. But that's not what I care about.
I am quite curious what is/are the difference(s) between anecdote and
evidence such that you can blithely assert that one is not the other.
/r$
--
STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/
