xml-dev

← back

145 messages · 31 threads

# Subject From Date
00031 Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-03 13:12
00020 Re: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Bob Jolliffe 2011-12-03 14:53
00033 Re: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Michael Sokolov 2011-12-03 15:13
00079 RE: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? David Lee 2011-12-03 15:19
00070 Re: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? [email protected] 2011-12-03 15:29
00069 RE: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Toby Considine 2011-12-03 15:46
00080 Re: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Nico van de Water 2011-12-03 16:42
00032 RE: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Len Bullard 2011-12-03 21:37
00021 Re: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Michael Kay 2011-12-04 12:43
00030 Ways of breaking out of normal interpretation and meaning Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-04 13:39
00022 Re: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Michael Sokolov 2011-12-04 14:40
00051 Re: [xml-dev] Ways of breaking out of normal interpretation and meaning John Cowan 2011-12-04 17:33
00043 RE: [xml-dev] Ways of breaking out of normal interpretation and meaning Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-04 20:37
00008 Re: [xml-dev] Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Jim Melton 2011-12-05 01:17
00019 business card Andrew Welch 2011-12-05 12:00
00018 RE: [xml-dev] business card Geert Josten 2011-12-05 12:18
00009 Re: [xml-dev] business card Michael Kay 2011-12-05 13:32
00042 Re: [xml-dev] business card Ivan Pedruzzi 2011-12-05 16:56
00052 Re: [xml-dev] business card [email protected] 2011-12-05 21:28
00041 Re: [xml-dev] business card Chris Maloney 2011-12-05 22:15
00053 Re: [xml-dev] Ways of breaking out of normal interpretation and meaning Frank Manola 2011-12-05 23:57
00076 RE: [xml-dev] business card Geert Josten 2011-12-06 06:54
00063 Re: [xml-dev] business card Petite Abeille 2011-12-06 10:41
00023 RE: [xml-dev] Ways of breaking out of normal interpretation and meaning Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-06 13:17
00039 Lightweight browser-based XML / Form editor for taxonomies with support for nesting /recursion Lech Rzedzicki 2011-12-06 16:52
00038 Re: [xml-dev] Lightweight browser-based XML / Form editor for taxonomies with support for nesting /recursion George Cristian Bina 2011-12-06 19:57
00025 RE: [xml-dev] Lightweight browser-based XML / Form editor for taxonomies with support for nesting /recursion Geert Josten 2011-12-06 19:59
00061 Re: [xml-dev] Lightweight browser-based XML / Form editor for taxonomies with support for nesting /recursion Alain Couthures 2011-12-06 21:40
00077 RE: [xml-dev] Lightweight browser-based XML / Form editor for taxonomies with support for nesting /recursion Geert Josten 2011-12-07 10:12
00066 RE: [xml-dev] Lightweight browser-based XML / Form editor for taxonomies with support for nesting /recursion Philip Fennell 2011-12-07 12:05
00075 Exploiting XML namespaces formatted as IRIs (Internationalized Resource Identifiers) to perpetrate an IDN homograph attack Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-09 16:24
00005 Re: [xml-dev] Exploiting XML namespaces formatted as IRIs (Internationalized Resource Identifiers) to perpetrate an IDN homograph attack G. Ken Holman 2011-12-09 17:12
00012 Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas John Christopher 2011-12-09 18:04
00055 Re: [xml-dev] Exploiting XML namespaces formatted as IRIs (Internationalized Resource Identifiers) to perpetrate an IDN homograph attack Rand McRanderson 2011-12-09 18:19
00050 Re: [xml-dev] Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas Peter Hunsberger 2011-12-09 18:24
00048 Re: [xml-dev] Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas Andrew Welch 2011-12-09 18:30
00056 Re: [xml-dev] Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas John Cowan 2011-12-09 18:55
00011 Re: [xml-dev] Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas Liam R E Quin 2011-12-09 19:40
00007 Re: [xml-dev] Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas George Cristian Bina 2011-12-09 20:04
00013 Re: [xml-dev] Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas John Cowan 2011-12-09 20:14
00002 Do your XML Schemas or Relax NG schemas have recursive definitions? Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-09 20:47
00017 Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-10 11:53
00000 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Andrew Welch 2011-12-10 12:14
00046 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Manos Batsis 2011-12-10 12:35
00058 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Michael Sokolov 2011-12-11 01:12
00059 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Liam R E Quin 2011-12-11 02:39
00045 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? G. Ken Holman 2011-12-11 11:50
00004 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Cecil New 2011-12-11 12:55
00014 RE: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? David Lee 2011-12-11 15:12
00006 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Andrew Welch 2011-12-11 16:52
00010 RE: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? David Lee 2011-12-11 17:12
00067 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Andrew Welch 2011-12-11 17:20
00072 [Summary] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-11 22:33
00037 Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? G. Ken Holman 2011-12-11 22:43
00026 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? David Carlisle 2011-12-12 09:30
00029 RE: [xml-dev] [Summary] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-12 11:42
00034 RE: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? David Lee 2011-12-12 13:33
00073 Re: [xml-dev] Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? David Carlisle 2011-12-12 14:06
00065 RE: Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Cox, Bruce 2011-12-12 18:42
00078 RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported? Cox, Bruce 2011-12-13 17:00
00062 OASIS catalogs: <system> and <uri> entries Michael Kay 2011-12-13 17:41
00028 Re: [xml-dev] OASIS catalogs: <system> and <uri> entries John Cowan 2011-12-13 18:24
00035 Re: [xml-dev] OASIS catalogs: <system> and <uri> entries Jirka Kosek 2011-12-13 19:04
00074 Re: [xml-dev] OASIS catalogs: <system> and <uri> entries Jirka Kosek 2011-12-13 19:45
00064 Re: [xml-dev] OASIS catalogs: <system> and <uri> entries Michael Kay 2011-12-13 20:47
00068 Update to xmlsh version 1.1.8 David Lee 2011-12-14 16:20
00071 Is it valid in XSD to have choice where all particles are optional Jirka Kosek 2011-12-15 14:56
00036 Re: [xml-dev] Is it valid in XSD to have choice where all particles are optional Michael Kay 2011-12-15 15:21
00027 Re: [xml-dev] Is it valid in XSD to have choice where all particles are optional Jirka Kosek 2011-12-15 16:32
00040 Re: [xml-dev] Is it valid in XSD to have choice where all particles are optional Michael Kay 2011-12-15 18:34
00024 Two interesting comments from Michael Kay Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-15 19:48
00060 Re: [xml-dev] Two interesting comments from Michael Kay Chris Maloney 2011-12-15 20:37
00044 Re: [xml-dev] Two interesting comments from Michael Kay Michael Glavassevich 2011-12-15 20:46
00003 RE: [xml-dev] Two interesting comments from Michael Kay Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-15 21:02
00015 Re: [xml-dev] Two interesting comments from Michael Kay Chris Maloney 2011-12-15 21:15
00016 Markup Combinators -- A Functional Approach to XML Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-16 18:59
00001 RE: Markup Combinators -- A Functional Approach to XML Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-17 14:04
00047 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Markup Combinators -- A Functional Approach to XML Piotr Bański 2011-12-17 15:58
00057 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Markup Combinators -- A Functional Approach to XML Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-17 16:26
00049 Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-17 19:50
00054 RE: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" David Lee 2011-12-17 20:16
00115 Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" Henry Luo 2011-12-18 06:37
00125 Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" Liam R E Quin 2011-12-18 07:50
00096 Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" Michael Sokolov 2011-12-18 13:02
00085 Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" James Fuller 2011-12-18 19:27
00086 Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" Michael Kay 2011-12-18 20:17
00095 RE: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" Len Bullard 2011-12-18 21:06
00126 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? Lech Rzedzicki 2011-12-19 11:52
00113 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Percentage of XML documents exclusively processed by machines? [email protected] 2011-12-19 15:20
00124 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Markup Combinators -- A Functional Approach to XML Cox, Bruce 2011-12-19 18:03
00117 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Markup Combinators -- A Functional Approach to XML Norm Birkett 2011-12-19 18:58
00107 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Markup Combinators -- A Functional Approach to XML Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-19 19:33
00100 Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" Kurt Cagle 2011-12-20 02:41
00137 Re: [xml-dev] Most XML vocabularies are too large and inevitably have lots of "holes" [email protected] 2011-12-20 12:18
00141 Two philosophies of XML usage Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-22 14:19
00142 Re: [xml-dev] Two philosophies of XML usage Richard Salz 2011-12-22 16:09
00136 Re: [xml-dev] Two philosophies of XML usage [email protected] 2011-12-22 16:20
00102 Re: [xml-dev] Two philosophies of XML usage Tei 2011-12-22 17:08
00106 Re: [xml-dev] Two philosophies of XML usage Pete Cordell 2011-12-22 17:32
00098 Re:1 David Carver 2011-12-24 16:55
00108 RE: xml-dev Digest 24 Dec 2011 16:55:59 -0000 Issue 2593 Len Bullard 2011-12-25 01:05
00097 Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-28 13:41
00110 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Richard Salz 2011-12-28 13:55
00143 RE: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-28 14:47
00135 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services [email protected] 2011-12-28 17:01
00134 RE: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Richard Salz 2011-12-28 17:24
00144 RE: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-28 17:35
00109 RE: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Richard Salz 2011-12-28 17:48
00099 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Frank Manola 2011-12-28 18:09
00105 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services David Lee 2011-12-28 22:20
00101 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services John Cowan 2011-12-29 05:45
00122 SV: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Sigfrid Lundberg 2011-12-29 08:13
00118 Nominations for the best XML markup language of all time Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-29 12:32
00087 Re: [xml-dev] Nominations for the best XML markup language of all time G. Ken Holman 2011-12-29 12:43
00094 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Richard Salz 2011-12-29 18:23
00093 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Pete Cordell 2011-12-29 18:45
00088 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services David Lee 2011-12-29 19:04
00116 Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-29 19:18
00123 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Michael Kay 2011-12-29 19:47
00114 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Richard Salz 2011-12-29 20:09
00127 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services John Cowan 2011-12-29 20:21
00139 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] David Lee 2011-12-29 21:04
00132 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Michael Sokolov 2011-12-29 21:42
00103 Re: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Greg Hunt 2011-12-29 22:22
00112 RE: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-29 23:34
00111 RE: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Len Bullard 2011-12-30 01:13
00104 RE: [xml-dev] Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services Len Bullard 2011-12-30 01:18
00131 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Liam R E Quin 2011-12-30 01:33
00140 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] David Lee 2011-12-30 01:41
00133 RE: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Len Bullard 2011-12-30 02:02
00138 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Michael Kay 2011-12-30 08:16
00083 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Tom De Herdt 2011-12-30 12:03
00090 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] [email protected] 2011-12-30 13:44
00128 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Tei 2011-12-30 14:00
00121 FW: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Costello, Roger L. 2011-12-30 14:56
00120 Re: FW: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Andrew Welch 2011-12-30 15:16
00129 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Pete Cordell 2011-12-30 17:07
00089 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] John Cowan 2011-12-30 17:36
00084 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] John Cowan 2011-12-30 17:37
00091 Re: FW: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] [email protected] 2011-12-30 20:03
00082 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] [email protected] 2011-12-30 20:07
00092 Re: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] [email protected] 2011-12-30 20:11
00081 RE: Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Cox, Bruce 2011-12-31 00:12
00119 RE: [xml-dev] Engineering versus Science, Anecdote versus Evidence ... [Was: Designing an experiment to gather evidence on approaches to designing web services] Len Bullard 2011-12-31 20:50
00130 what's missing in XML? What's coming? Liam R E Quin 2012-01-01 04:10