Original Message From: "John Cowan"
> It's required in XML, because if you need to have "]]>" in character
> content, it has to be written "]]>" or the NCR equivalent. MicroXML
> requires all instances of ">" to be ">" for consistency. However,
> this is not true in attribute values, primarily for compatibility with
> Canonical XML. I would consider requests to change this.
Escaping > to > can be a bit of a pain when including example code in
XML.
It would be nice to say that nobody in their right mind would include ]]> in
their documents (unless they were documenting XML!) and we can just turn a
blind eye to that XML compatibility issue! (Googling ]]> yields nothing but
that might say more about what Google indexes than what is out there.)
Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info
