KML is very extensible ... but why?

xml-dev · April 2018 · 18 messages · back to month

#	Subject	From	Date
00029	KML is very extensible ... but why?	Costello, Roger L.	2018-04-20 16:59
00030	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Eliot Kimber	2018-04-20 17:19
00031	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	G. Ken Holman	2018-04-20 17:22
00028	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Michael Kay	2018-04-20 17:31
00012	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Rick Jelliffe	2018-04-21 06:42
00014	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Simon St.Laurent	2018-04-22 21:29
00008	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Patrick Durusau	2018-04-22 21:50
00016	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Simon St.Laurent	2018-04-22 22:04
00007	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Patrick Durusau	2018-04-23 00:02
00018	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Dan Brickley	2018-04-23 00:38
00032	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Simon St.Laurent	2018-04-23 00:56
00027	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Rick Jelliffe	2018-04-23 04:15
00026	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Rick Jelliffe	2018-04-23 04:31
00033	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Michael Kay	2018-04-23 07:15
00017	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Simon St.Laurent	2018-04-23 10:35
00009	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Rick Jelliffe	2018-04-24 06:12
00011	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Simon St.Laurent	2018-04-25 10:42
00022	Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why?	Patrick Durusau	2018-04-25 13:15