RE: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16

From
Eran Hammer-Lahav <>
Date
2009-07-23T05:35:30+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16
Title: Re: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16

How about <Subject set=”beginswith”>?

 

EHL

 

From: Nat Sakimura
[mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:46 PM

To: Eran Hammer-Lahav

Cc: Scott Cantor; Drummond Reed; 

Subject: Re: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16

 

I like <Subject set="prefix"> beter than
<SubjectPrefix> ... 

Also, "prefix" does not seem to be a right terminology here for me 

because it is not a prefix but is a part of the string. 

Perhaps "forwardmatch" or "substr" etc. ?

=nat

Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: 

Thanks. Then my <SubjectPrefix>
proposal stands.

EHL

On 7/21/09 11:32 AM, "Scott Cantor" <>
wrote:

Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2009-07-21:

> So... I have a question to the security folks: since we don't really need

a

> Subject for host-meta, only a place to stick the trust subject, can we

just

> have a Subject-less document with an XRD-level <ds:KeyInfo>? But it
does

> require being able to put the hostname, port number, and protocol details

> inside the ds:KeyInfo element which I am not sure is possible.

It's not possible semantically even it were made true syntactically via an

extension.

-- Scott