Title: Re: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16
I like it!
=nat
Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
"
type="cite">
How
about <Subject set=”beginswith”>?
EHL
From:
Nat Sakimura
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:46 PM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
Cc: Scott Cantor; Drummond Reed;
Subject: Re: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday
2009-07-16
I like <Subject set="prefix"> beter than
<SubjectPrefix> ...
Also, "prefix" does not seem to be a right terminology here for me
because it is not a prefix but is a part of the string.
Perhaps "forwardmatch" or "substr" etc. ?
=nat
Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
Thanks.
Then my <SubjectPrefix>
proposal stands.
EHL
On 7/21/09 11:32 AM, "Scott Cantor" <>
wrote:
Eran
Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2009-07-21:
> So... I have a question to the security folks: since we don't
really need
a
> Subject for host-meta, only a place to stick the trust subject,
can we
just
> have a Subject-less document with an XRD-level <ds:KeyInfo>?
But it
does
> require being able to put the hostname, port number, and protocol
details
> inside the ds:KeyInfo element which I am not sure is possible.
It's not possible semantically even it were made true syntactically via
an
extension.
-- Scott
