On Jul 3, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
>> Well there is a precedence. Even though a XRD-linked XRD shares the
>> semantics as one linked from an HTTP header, we can't ignore the fact
>> that <Link> elements do in fact have a priority. I remember that
>> LRDD
>> specifically stated that determining which one of multiple
>> describedby
>> links should be used was application specific. And that seems to
>> make
>> sense because there is no good deterministic way to order them. We
>> can order <Link> elements though, so it makes sense to respect their
>> order.
>
> I agree that Link priority must take precedence but that's the easy
> case. What happens when all priorities are equal.
If a linked XRD is really just another linked resource, then the spec
instructs consuming applications to choose randomly.
