Re: Action Item for TC: answer this design question

At 01/07/19 14:17 -0400,  wrote:
>The high-level question is:
>How should we organize the reference output files?
>The ideas that have been circulated so far can be segregated into
>three classes:
>1. Put the outputs in a separate tree from the tests, with parallel
>    subdirectory structures in each.
>2. Leave the outputs wherever the submitter put them and find them
>    by some sort of naming scheme.
>3. Put the outputs in subdirectories dispersed throughout the tree
>    of test cases, and use a designated name for the subdirectory.
>Please choose 1, 2, or 3, and give reasons, or say you have no
>opinion.

1 - because that preserves the submitter's subdirectory to the point of 
being absolutely read-only and sacrosanct.

..................... Ken

At 01/07/18 20:14 -0400,  wrote:
>Ken likes the idea of delivering the reference output in a parallel
>tree.


--
G. Ken Holman                      mailto:
Crane Softwrights Ltd.               http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/m/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0     +1(613)489-0999   (Fax:-0995)
Web site:     XSL/XML/DSSSL/SGML/OmniMark services, training, products.
Book:  Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath ISBN 1-894049-06-3
Article: What is XSLT? http://www.xml.com/pub/2000/08/holman/index.html
Next public instructor-led training:      2001-08-12,08-13,09-19,10-01,
-                                         10-04,10-22,12-09,12-10,02-02

Training Blitz: 3-days XSLT/XPath, 2-days XSLFO in Ottawa 2001-10-01/05