| 00000 |
NEW ISSUE: What is the purpose of definitions/binding element? |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-11-05 06:23 |
| 00001 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Response to: "Microsoft technical comment: Developinteroperable approach notspecific to SCA for callbacks" |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-11-05 07:34 |
| 00002 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-05 13:48 |
| 00003 |
NEW ISSUE: No defined behaviour in JMS binding if resolved operation namenot present in interface |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-05 13:49 |
| 00004 |
Proposed resolution for issue BINDINGS-97 |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-05 14:01 |
| 00005 |
Re: NEW ISSUE: no defaults for JMS headers |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-05 14:06 |
| 00006 |
Re: NEW ISSUE: No defined behaviour in JMS binding if resolved operationnamenot present in interface |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-05 14:07 |
| 00007 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-05 14:08 |
| 00008 |
BINDINGS-94 revised proposal. |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-05 14:26 |
| 00009 |
NEW ISSUE: incorrect closing <headers> element in JMS pseudo-schema |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-05 14:51 |
| 00010 |
Comments on issues BINDINGS-95, 105 and 106 - priority rules for headersetc. |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-05 16:01 |
| 00011 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-05 16:09 |
| 00012 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-05 16:16 |
| 00013 |
Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-107: What is the purpose of definitions/bindingelement? |
Eric Johnson
|
2009-11-05 16:58 |
| 00014 |
Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-108: No defined behaviour in JMS bindingif resolved operation name not present in interface |
Eric Johnson
|
2009-11-05 17:00 |
| 00015 |
Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-109: incorrect closing <headers> elementin JMS pseudo-schema |
Eric Johnson
|
2009-11-05 17:07 |
| 00016 |
Raw chat log of 2009-11-05 telcon |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-11-05 18:02 |
| 00017 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Comments on issues BINDINGS-95, 105 and 106 -priority rules for headers etc. |
Eric Johnson
|
2009-11-05 23:05 |
| 00018 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-06 13:30 |
| 00019 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-06 13:42 |
| 00020 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-06 13:44 |
| 00021 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-05 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-05.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-06 13:47 |
| 00022 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-10-15 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-10-15.doc) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-06 13:51 |
| 00023 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-06 13:55 |
| 00024 |
Re: [sca-bindings-comment] Comments on sca-jcabinding-1.1-spec.pdf |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-06 14:09 |
| 00025 |
Re: [sca-bindings-comment] Comments on binding specs |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-06 14:09 |
| 00026 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Comments on issues BINDINGS-95, 105 and 106 - priorityrules for headers etc. |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-09 10:31 |
| 00027 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-11 21:57 |
| 00028 |
Fw: Requesting LOA from SCA committtees |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-18 10:51 |
| 00029 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-18 10:59 |
| 00030 |
Re: Issue BINDINGS-107 |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-18 11:02 |
| 00031 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-18 11:33 |
| 00032 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: Issue BINDINGS-107 |
David Booz
|
2009-11-18 12:44 |
| 00033 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: Issue BINDINGS-107 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-11-18 12:57 |
| 00034 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: Issue BINDINGS-107 |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-11-19 06:39 |
| 00035 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: Issue BINDINGS-107 |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-19 14:24 |
| 00036 |
Updated proposal for issue BINDINGS-103 |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-19 15:12 |
| 00037 |
Updated proposal for issue BINDINGS-103 second attempt |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-19 15:20 |
| 00038 |
Issues BINDINGS-88 and BINDINGS-89 |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-19 15:33 |
| 00039 |
NEW ISSUE: no priority rules for JCA binding URI and elements |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-19 15:37 |
| 00040 |
[sca-bindings] please ignore previous NEW ISSUE: no priority rules for JCAbinding URI and elements |
Rimon Ioldsworth
|
2009-11-19 16:15 |
| 00041 |
Issues BINDINGS-88 and BINDINGS-89 - modified JCA binding spec doc |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-11-19 16:17 |
| 00042 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-19 16:22 |
| 00043 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-19 16:24 |
| 00044 |
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: What is the purpose of definitions/bindingelement (for JMS binding)? |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-11-19 17:23 |
| 00045 |
raw chat minutes from Nov 19 |
David Booz
|
2009-11-19 18:04 |
| 00046 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-19 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-19.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-20 11:27 |
| 00047 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-05 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-11-05.doc) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-20 11:27 |
| 00048 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-20 11:31 |
| 00049 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Issues (sca-bindings-jira-issues.html) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-11-20 13:57 |
