← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Draft Minutes 2008-07-22 are attached

From
Bob Freund <>
Date
2008-07-29T13:48:56+00:00
ID
Thread
Draft Minutes 2008-07-22 are attached
Title: SCA-Assy - 2008-07-22

   
   
      
Hide IRC 

      

         

         - DRAFT -
         SCA-Assembly Teleconference
         22 JUL 2008
         Attendees
         
            Present
            Mark Combellack, (Avaya, Inc.)
            Dale Moberg, (Axway Software*)
            Robert Freund, (Hitachi, Ltd.)
            Eric Wells, (Hitachi, Ltd.)
            Bryan Aupperle, (IBM)
            Michael Beisiegel, (IBM)
            David Booz, (IBM)
            Graham Charters, (IBM)
            Mike Edwards, (IBM)
            Dieter Koenig, (IBM)
            Simon Moser, (IBM)
            Simon Nash, (IBM)
            Peter Furniss, (Iris Financial Solutions Ltd.)
            Jeff Estefan, (Jet Propulsion Laboratory:*)
            Martin Chapman, (Oracle Corporation)
            Anish Karmarkar, (Oracle Corporation)
            Rich Levinson, (Oracle Corporation)
            Ashok Malhotra, (Oracle Corporation)
            Gilbert Pilz, (Oracle Corporation)
            Sabin Ielceanu, (TIBCO Software Inc.)
            Chairs
            Martin Chapman
            Mike Edwards
            Scribe
            Eric Wells
            Agenda:
            1. Opening
Introductions
Roll call
Scribe confirmation
Agenda bashing
2. Approval of minutes of SCA-Assembly TC meeting of 8th July
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/28762/SCA%20Assembly%20minutes%202008-07-08.html
3. Action Items:
2008-04-28-1: Editors to address the editorial comments contained in Combellack's comments at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200804/msg00089.html
2008-06-03-3: Simon Nash and Anish Karmarkar to develop a more concrete proposal for Issue 37 along the lines of the F2F discussion
               so that profitable discussion may continue this meeting.
2008-06-03-4: Chapman to propose some non-normative clarification test to resolve Issue-26 due=2008-12-24
2008-06-03-6: Test sub cttee produce test assertions and test artifacts and test harness
2008-06-03-8: ref Assembly-16 Nash to look into how binding uris may be handled
2008-07-08-1: Simon Nash - Review spec for areas that might benefit from illustration by the addition of pseudo-schema
4. New Issues
ASSEMBLY-73 What correlation support should SCA provide for callbacks?
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-73
5. Existing Issues
ASSEMBLY-53 Contribution Extension Model
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-53
Updated proposal is contained in this email
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200806/msg00043.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200807/msg00027.html
ASSEMBLY-8 SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-8
Latest discussion and proposal:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200807/msg00021.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200807/msg00027.html
ASSEMBLY-41 Conflicting domain-level deployments
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-41
Proposed update to the Issue:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200807/msg00029.html
Requires a writeup based on discussions at the F2F
ASSEMBLY-37 Need to clarify contents of an SCA Domain virtual composite
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-37
Waiting for a write-up based on discussions at the F2F meeting
ASSEMBLY-16 Component URI is not well described
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-16
Proposal requires write-up of 2 separate action items from the F2F
1)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200807/msg00020.html
ASSEMBLY-33 Long-Running Request-Response Operations
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-33
Waiting on a write up based on the discussions at the F2F
6. AOB
Next meeting is on July 29th
            
         
      

      
      

         Contents
         
            Topics 
            
            [1] 
               Agenda bashing
            
            [2] 
               Minutes
            
            [3] 
               Action Items
            
            [4] 
               Roll Call
            
            [5] 
               New Issues
            
            [6] 
               ASSEMBLY-73
            
            [7] 
               Open Issues
            
            [8] 
               ASSEMBLY-53 Contribution Extension Model
            
            [9] 
               ASSEMBLY-8 SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
            
            [10] 
               AOB
            
            Table of Resolutions
            Table of Action Items
         
      

      
      

         Action Items
         
            Old:
            2008-04-28-1: id=2008-04-28-1 status=Pending Editors to address the editorial comments contained in Combellack's comments at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200804/msg00089.html
            
            2008-06-03-3: id=2008-06-03-3 status=Pending Simon Nash and Anish Karmarkar to develop a more concrete proposal for Issue 37 along the lines
               of the F2F discussion so that profitable discussion may continue this meeting.
            
            2008-06-03-4: id=2008-06-03-4 status=Pending Chapman to propose some non-normative clarification test to resolve Issue-26 due=2008-12-24
            
            2008-06-03-6: id=2008-06-03-6 status=Pending Test sub cttee produce test assertions and test artifacts and test harness
            
            2008-06-03-8: id=2008-06-03-8 status=Completed ref Assembly-16 Nash to look into how binding uris may be handled
            
            2008-07-08-1: id=2008-07-08-1 status=Pending Simon Nash - Review spec for areas that might benefit from illustration by the addition of
               pseudo-schema
            
            New:
            2008-07-22-1: Aupperle to raise new issue(s) wrt ASSEMBLY-28
            
            2008-07-22-2: Edwards to raise an issue regarding definition of lifecycle model
            
            2008-07-22-3: Karmarkar to send an E-mail with detials of use case
            
            2008-07-22-4: Booz to rewrite 11.2.1 to consider Simon N's use case
            
            2008-07-22-5: Edwards to start discussion on E-mail regarding Section 6.6
            
         
      

      
      

         Resolutions
         
            
2008-07-22-1: Minutes of 18-Jul-08 accepted w/o
            

            
2008-07-22-2: Issue ASSEMBLY-73 opened w/o
            

            
2008-07-22-3: Resolve ASSEMBLY-53 with propsal in E-mail issue=53
            

         
      

      
      

         Minutes
         

            
 Scribe: Eric Wells

         

         

            Agenda bashing
         

         

            
 

            
No additions - agenda accepted

         

         

            Minutes
         

         

            
 

            
Approval of 18-Jul-08 minutes

         

         
Resolution: Minutes of 18-Jul-08 accepted w/o
         

         

            Action Items
         

         
 Action: id=2008-04-28-1 status=Pending Editors to address the editorial comments contained in Combellack's comments at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200804/msg00089.html
         

         
 Action: id=2008-06-03-3 status=Pending Simon Nash and Anish Karmarkar to develop a more concrete proposal for Issue 37 along the lines
            of the F2F discussion so that profitable discussion may continue this meeting.
         

         
 Action: id=2008-06-03-4 status=Pending Chapman to propose some non-normative clarification test to resolve Issue-26 due=2008-12-24
         

         
 Action: id=2008-06-03-6 status=Pending Test sub cttee produce test assertions and test artifacts and test harness
         

         
 Action: id=2008-06-03-8 status=Completed ref Assembly-16 Nash to look into how binding uris may be handled
         

         
 Action: id=2008-07-08-1 status=Pending Simon Nash - Review spec for areas that might benefit from illustration by the addition of
            pseudo-schema
         

         

            Roll Call
         

         

            
 

            
16/24 Members present - Quorate

         

         

            New Issues
         

         

            ASSEMBLY-73
         

         
Motion: Open Issue 73 m: Martin C s: Bryan A
         

         
Resolution: Issue ASSEMBLY-73 opened w/o
         

         

            Open Issues
         

         

            ASSEMBLY-53 Contribution Extension Model
         

         

            
Aupperle:

            
 Reviews his proposal

         

         

            
 

            
... conflict between this and ASSEMBLY-28

         

         

            
 

            
... can Schema experts address this?

         

         

            
 

            
Proposal attached to E-mail:http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200806/msg00043.html

         

         

            
 

            
ASSEMBLY-28 already in CD document

         

         
 Action: Aupperle to raise new issue(s) wrt ASSEMBLY-28
         

         

            
 

            
Discussion on proposal for ASSEMBLY-53 (in "Contribution.doc")

         

         
Resolution: Resolve ASSEMBLY-53 with propsal in E-mail issue=53
         

         

            
 

            
Proposal accepted w/o

         

         

            ASSEMBLY-8 SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
         

         

            
 <Dave Booz> 

            
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200807/msg00033.html

         

         

            
 

            
Proposal attached to above message

         

         

            
 <Dave Booz> 

            
navigate to section 6.6

         

         

            
 

            
Dave B: Reviews proposed changes

         

         

            
Martin C:

            
 SCA-Runtime must raise an error - what sort of error?

         

         

            
 <anish> 

            
i think this error can be raised at deployment. But we should not force it. It must be raised at least before 'runtime'

         

         

            
 

            
... if not running how is error sent/received?

         

         

            
 

            
Discussion on whether entire contribution should be rejected or just the part that causes error

         

         

            
 <anish> 

            
so, there are two things we should say: 'when' and on 'what'

         

         

            
 

            
Also (subtle) distinction between deployment or runtime

         

         

            
 

            
Wording in final paragraph of section 6.6 needs changing to be more specific

         

         

            
Martin C:

            
 Have talked in the past about abstract lifecycle definition

         

         

            
 

            
... if we had this it would make the "When" easier

         

         
 Action: Edwards to raise an issue regarding definition of lifecycle model
         

         

            
 

            
Discussion of "What" and if entire contribution s/b rejected

         

         

            
 

            
Simon N: Would be good if we could only reject bad part of contribution

         

         

            
 

            
... but only if we can be sure there are no dependencies

         

         

            
 <Martin C> 

            
how about: As a result, the SCA runtime MUST reject a deployment composite if an included composite is not found within the
               same SCA contribution as the including deployment composite
            

         

         

            
 <Simon Nash> 

            
The SCA runtime must prevent execution of any deployment composite that depends on a composite with any included composite
               that is not found within the same SCA contribution
            

         

         

            
 <Simon Nash> 

            
the "depends on" part is needed

         

         

            
 

            
Next section of proposal - Section 11.2.1

         

         

            
 

            
Dave B: Reviews proposal

         

         

            
Anish:

            
 Wording is not clear where WSDL would be resolved

         

         

            
 

            
... Example IS clear but wording could be interpreted differently

         

         

            
 <anish> 

            
dave, what did you have in mind wrt recursive imports?

         

         

            
 <anish> 

            
never mind. u do have words about looking recursively

         

         

            
 

            
Long discussion on how these imports work

         

         

            
 

            
Overriding local by imports, etc.

         

         

            
 

            
(Sorry don't know what happend there)

         

         

            
 

            
Mike E: Any other comments on this section?

         

         

            
 <Simon Nash> 

            
a imports namespace foo from b / b imports namespace bar from c / a references something in bar / does something come from
               a or c?
            

         

         

            
Anish:

            
 Describes a use case where imports could be ambiguous

         

         

            
 

            
Simon N: Clarifies use case discussed earlier

         

         

            
 

            
Mike E: There seems to be too many concerns to resolve - continue discussion on E-mail list

         

         
 Action: Karmarkar to send an E-mail with detials of use case
         

         

            
 <anish> 

            
Anish's usecase: three contributions X, Y and Z. Point out the case where a wsdl is imported in X from Y and the  wsdl references
               a schema that is also available in both Y and Z. In such a case the schema for the wsdl must come from Y and not Z.
            

         

         
 Action: Booz to rewrite 11.2.1 to consider Simon N's use case
         

         

            
 <bob> 

            
/eric, new ais are auto numbered.

         

         
 Action: Edwards to start discussion on E-mail regarding Section 6.6
         

         

            
 <Simon Nash> 

            
i thought what we wanted to enforce was that if a imports foo from b and b contains something that uses foo.qname, the search
               for foo.qname must not go to a
the other case I am concerned about is that a imports foo from b and a contains something that uses foo.qnamei think the search
               for foo.qname should go to a
            

         

         

            
 

            
Further discussion on imports - caching, OSGI model

         

         

            AOB
         

         

            
 

            
Straggler role

         

         

            
 

            
Adjourned 8:59AM PST

         

      

      

         
[End of Minutes]
 Formatted on 2008-07-29 at 09:47:03 GMT-4
         

         
         Minutes formatted by Schreiber, a collection of XSLT
            stylesheets by Bob Freund modeled after David Booth's scribe 
         
      

      

         
         Schreiber diagnostics output[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]

final validation: Chair not specified, default chair was assumed

         
name-value: Line 127: Invalid status 'Completed'

         
citation-detection-scribed: Line 175: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Dave B'

         
citation-detection-scribed: Line 199: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Simon N'

         
citation-detection-scribed: Line 211: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Dave B'

         
citation-detection-scribed: Line 227: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Mike E'

         
citation-detection-scribed: Line 233: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Simon N'

         
citation-detection-scribed: Line 235: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Mike E'

         
citation-detection-scribed: Line 256: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Adjourned 8'

         
statistics: Schreiber found 146 input lines

         
edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:

         
edits: Line 173: Bryan Aupperle: s/Close ASSEMBLY-53/Resolve ASSEMBLY-53/

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 12: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 14: Check for possible unrecognized nick '3. Action Items'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 16: Check for possible unrecognized nick '2008-04-28-1'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 18: Check for possible unrecognized nick '2008-06-03-3'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 20: Check for possible unrecognized nick '2008-06-03-4'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 22: Check for possible unrecognized nick '2008-06-03-6'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 24: Check for possible unrecognized nick '2008-06-03-8'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 26: Check for possible unrecognized nick '2008-07-08-1'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 32: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 39: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 42: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 43: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 46: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 49: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 50: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 53: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 56: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 60: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 65: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 69: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
citation-detection-irc1: Line 73: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

         
command-scribe: Line 104: Eric Wells recognized

         
command-scribe: Schreiber detected that this section was scribed online

         
edit-substitute: command on line 173 succeeded, changed line 161 from 'Close ASSEMBLY-53' to 'Resolve ASSEMBLY-53'

         
edit-delete: Line 173 was deleted

         
system: Transformer: SAXON 8.9

         
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →