← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

[NEW ISSUE] Assemly Specification should not state what marks a Javainterface as Local

From
Mike Edwards <>
Date
2008-10-29T08:56:16+00:00
ID
Thread
[NEW ISSUE] Assemly Specification should not state what marks a Javainterface as Local
Raiser:        
       Mike Edwards

Target:        
       SCA Assembly Specification - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2.doc

Description:

In lines 2425-2426, the Assembly specification
makes a statement about what marks out a Java interface as being Local:

"In
the case of Java a local service is defined by a Java interface definition
without a @Remotable annotation."

The Assembly specification has no business
defining things that relate to an artifact that is normatively defined
by another

specification, namely the Java Common
Annotations & APIs specification.  This becomes a problem if and
when the Java

CAA specification changes the way in
which a Java interface is marked as Local.

Proposal:

Remove the sentence relating to Java
interfaces in Lines 2425 -2426.

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →