UML reveals issue in WS-Calendar PSM

The next PIM working draft with fixes
for these and other issues (all the Public Review Comments) will
be uploaded tonight.
Eyes on the issues Toby mentioned would be good, so we can avoid a
second public review before Committee Spec.
Thanks!
bill

--
William Cox
Email:  
Web:  http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax
On 7/31/14 4:54 PM, Toby Considine wrote:
The detailed work of the PIM revealed some
flaws in the PSM spec. Notably:

The degenerate bound intervals at the heart
of FREEBUSY and AVAILABILITY are never adequately defined in
the spec or in the Schemas.

The RRULES used in Availability are not
adequately represented in VAVAILABILITY.

If these issues are interesting to you, I
urge you to attend the workshop meeting tomorrow to discuss
the implications for the PSM.

tc


Debugging is twice as hard as writing
the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the
code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not
smart enough to debug it.
-
Brian W. Kernighan
Toby Considine
TC9, Inc
OASIS TC Chair: oBIX &
WS-Calendar
OASIS TC Editor: EMIX, Energy
Interoperation
SGIP
Smart Grid Architecture Committee
Email:

Phone: (919)619-2104
http://www.tcnine.com
blog:  http://www.NewDaedalus.com