Marc,
thanks for the review. I
fixed the 'nit'. As for MC being 01 vs 05 - dunno - just picked 05
to be consistent with the others. Can easily switch it if people
think we should.
As for the Appendixes - I'm stumped
- I've been trying to get OO to turn those into links all day w/o luck.
Will keep trying.
Guess I'll upload the doc for the full
TC to review.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 |
Marc Goodner <>
02/02/2007 06:50 PM
To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
""
<>
Subject
RE: [ws-rx-editors] CD ready
Only one nit from me. In
RMP, note the unnecessary “the”:
“Note
that when there are multiple policy alternatives the of
the RM Assertion, the Delivery Assurance on each MUST NOT conflict.”
Couple of comments:
Should MC be CD01? I don’t
have strong feelings, just asking.
Appendixes in MC, RM and
RMP TOCs are not links. Is there some tooling problem that prevents that
from working?
I have not clicked all the
links in MC, RM and RMP, but the internal references I tried at random
and the active TOC ones seem to be OK.
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:58 AM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] CD ready
Importance: High
All,
the CD5 folder in the editor's area contains all of the files for
CD5 - please take a look and if they look ok I'll post them to the main
TC page. But I do need at least a couple of +1's :-)
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 |
