xml-dev

← back

192 messages · 29 threads

# Subject From Date
00031 Returned mail: see transcript for details [email protected] 2016-04-05 03:39
00039 Here’s how the Schematron program generates programs … program generating programs Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-05 12:54
00030 Re: [xml-dev] Here’s how the Schematron program generates programs … program generating programs G. Ken Holman 2016-04-05 13:14
00040 Re: [xml-dev] Here’s how the Schematron program generates programs program generating programs Michael Kay 2016-04-05 14:23
00061 Re: [xml-dev] Here’s how the Schematron program generates programs program generating programs David Carlisle 2016-04-05 15:43
00050 Re: [xml-dev] Here’s how the Schematron program generates programs program generating programs Thomas Passin 2016-04-05 20:37
00016 Standing on the shoulders of giants Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-06 12:08
00028 Fw: new message Bobby 2016-04-06 18:18
00027 Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-08 11:49
00018 Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY Christophe Marchand 2016-04-08 12:31
00048 Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY G. Ken Holman 2016-04-08 13:56
00062 Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY Michael Kay 2016-04-08 14:15
00053 Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY David Carlisle 2016-04-08 18:34
00060 YPath, ZPath? Hans-Juergen Rennau 2016-04-10 18:45
00005 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Liam R. E. Quin 2016-04-10 19:05
00010 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Hans-Juergen Rennau 2016-04-10 19:42
00042 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Alain Couthures 2016-04-10 20:01
00038 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Michael Kay 2016-04-10 21:20
00036 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Dimitre Novatchev 2016-04-11 04:09
00043 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Alain Couthures 2016-04-11 05:36
00009 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Hans-Juergen Rennau 2016-04-11 07:09
00007 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Hans-Juergen Rennau 2016-04-11 07:25
00011 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Ghislain Fourny 2016-04-11 07:41
00002 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Hans-Juergen Rennau 2016-04-11 12:48
00015 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Benito van der Zander 2016-04-11 12:59
00000 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Jim Melton 2016-04-11 17:25
00034 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Alain Couthures 2016-04-11 18:20
00045 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Dan Sullivan 2016-04-11 18:26
00046 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Alain Couthures 2016-04-11 18:53
00033 Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY Liam R. E. Quin 2016-04-11 22:32
00004 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Hans-Juergen Rennau 2016-04-12 07:56
00012 [ANN] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v6.7 [email protected] 2016-04-12 08:14
00006 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Michael Kay 2016-04-12 08:41
00008 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? - - 2016-04-12 15:36
00054 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Jim Melton 2016-04-12 16:57
00057 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Dave Pawson 2016-04-12 17:09
00026 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Michael Kay 2016-04-12 18:14
00019 Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY Peter Flynn 2016-04-12 20:59
00022 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Dave Pawson 2016-04-13 06:18
00023 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? HILLMAN, Tomos 2016-04-13 07:53
00058 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Michael Kay 2016-04-13 08:34
00052 Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath? Dave Pawson 2016-04-13 11:07
00063 Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-13 11:58
00049 [ANN] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v6.7 [email protected] 2016-04-14 08:34
00021 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Michael Kay 2016-04-14 10:34
00024 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Ghislain Fourny 2016-04-14 11:38
00059 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Stephen Cameron 2016-04-14 13:41
00051 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Ghislain Fourny 2016-04-14 14:00
00055 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Michael Kay 2016-04-14 15:41
00056 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Rick Jelliffe 2016-04-15 04:38
00025 XSLT / XPath / XML Training Courses on Pluralsight – 6 months FREE subscription Dimitre Novatchev 2016-04-15 04:40
00020 RE: Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-15 14:04
00029 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Simon St.Laurent 2016-04-15 14:11
00017 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Arjun Ray 2016-04-16 01:47
00047 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Michael Kay 2016-04-16 14:00
00032 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Thomas Passin 2016-04-16 15:32
00003 Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-16 16:11
00013 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Michael Kay 2016-04-16 17:00
00014 RE: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-16 17:09
00001 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Simon St.Laurent 2016-04-16 18:52
00035 Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-16 19:08
00044 Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model Simon St.Laurent 2016-04-16 19:10
00037 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Peter Flynn 2016-04-16 19:54
00041 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Hans-Juergen Rennau 2016-04-16 20:59
00116 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Jim Tivy 2016-04-16 21:18
00130 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Arjun Ray 2016-04-16 22:02
00087 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Arjun Ray 2016-04-16 22:21
00072 RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-16 22:30
00073 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Peter Flynn 2016-04-16 22:41
00086 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Arjun Ray 2016-04-16 22:56
00131 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Rick Jelliffe 2016-04-17 01:55
00114 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Rick Jelliffe 2016-04-17 04:24
00129 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Rick Jelliffe 2016-04-17 05:01
00118 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Michael Kay 2016-04-17 09:35
00103 RE: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-17 11:58
00091 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Steve Newcomb 2016-04-17 12:31
00151 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Liam R. E. Quin 2016-04-17 17:27
00160 Re: Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? [email protected] 2016-04-17 17:42
00161 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-17 17:58
00150 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Lauren Wood 2016-04-17 18:28
00093 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Peter Flynn 2016-04-17 18:36
00102 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Christopher R. Maden 2016-04-17 18:38
00089 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Arjun Ray 2016-04-17 19:10
00104 RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Evain, Jean-Pierre 2016-04-17 19:10
00088 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Arjun Ray 2016-04-17 19:47
00106 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Hans-Juergen Rennau 2016-04-17 20:26
00162 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names John Cowan 2016-04-17 23:59
00149 RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Evain, Jean-Pierre 2016-04-18 01:01
00148 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Michael Kay 2016-04-18 08:23
00163 Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model Ghislain Fourny 2016-04-18 08:58
00105 Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model Ghislain Fourny 2016-04-18 09:18
00090 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Norman Gray 2016-04-18 10:28
00101 Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Hans-Juergen Rennau 2016-04-18 11:05
00092 RE: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-18 11:32
00127 Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model Michael Kay 2016-04-18 12:21
00119 Fw: new message Bobby 2016-04-18 13:49
00074 Fw: new message Activities 2016-04-18 13:49
00085 Fw: new message Gerald Trites 2016-04-18 14:11
00084 RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names Evain, Jean-Pierre 2016-04-18 14:59
00075 XSD Validating unknown number of attributes from 1 to N Pedro Adame Vergara 2016-04-18 16:17
00117 Re: [xml-dev] XSD Validating unknown number of attributes from 1 to N Michael Kay 2016-04-18 22:20
00128 Re: [xml-dev] XSD Validating unknown number of attributes from 1 to N Pedro Adame Vergara 2016-04-18 22:34
00115 Re: [xml-dev] XSD Validating unknown number of attributes from 1 to N Peter Flynn 2016-04-18 22:47
00132 Transforming documents with undefined entities Andrew Campbell 2016-04-19 08:27
00157 Re: [xml-dev] Transforming documents with undefined entities G. Ken Holman 2016-04-19 12:41
00142 Re: [xml-dev] Transforming documents with undefined entities Andrew Campbell 2016-04-19 13:50
00094 3B2 markup/typesetting codes [email protected] 2016-04-19 15:16
00112 A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-20 02:13
00111 Re: [xml-dev] 3B2 markup/typesetting codes Gareth Oakes 2016-04-20 02:54
00096 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Alexander Johannesen 2016-04-20 03:37
00140 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Jim Melton 2016-04-20 21:06
00158 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Jim Melton 2016-04-20 21:23
00145 Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model Jim Melton 2016-04-20 21:33
00156 Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model Jim Melton 2016-04-20 21:49
00069 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? Michael Kay 2016-04-20 21:52
00078 Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model? John Cowan 2016-04-20 22:08
00134 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-21 01:31
00126 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Alexander Johannesen 2016-04-21 03:32
00124 [ann] oXygen XML Editor version 18 and new oXygen XML Web Author product George Bina 2016-04-21 19:11
00135 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-22 04:02
00077 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Alexander Johannesen 2016-04-22 08:13
00071 [ann] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v6.7 [email protected] 2016-04-22 08:14
00079 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Steve Newcomb 2016-04-22 12:33
00066 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Alexander Johannesen 2016-04-22 12:46
00083 [ANN] Release of XMLmind XSL-FO Converter v5.4.1 Hussein Shafie 2016-04-22 15:36
00064 yet another richly-typed, self-describing, hierarchical data serialization format Simon St.Laurent 2016-04-22 16:21
00122 Re: [xml-dev] yet another richly-typed, self-describing, hierarchical data serialization format Alain Couthures 2016-04-22 16:51
00137 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-23 04:53
00138 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-23 05:40
00121 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Alexander Johannesen 2016-04-23 05:43
00068 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-23 06:18
00080 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Alexander Johannesen 2016-04-23 06:45
00070 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Steve Newcomb 2016-04-23 13:34
00076 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Dave Pawson 2016-04-23 14:18
00146 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity John Cowan 2016-04-23 15:47
00153 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity James Bryce Clark OASIS 2016-04-23 16:55
00110 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-24 02:24
00097 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-24 02:31
00100 Decisions and making flexible systems Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-24 10:47
00107 Re: [xml-dev] yet another richly-typed, self-describing, hierarchical data serialization format Ghislain Fourny 2016-04-25 08:39
00154 RE: [xml-dev] yet another richly-typed, self-describing, hierarchical data serialization format Evain, Jean-Pierre 2016-04-25 08:59
00144 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Steve Newcomb 2016-04-25 13:49
00159 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Dave Pawson 2016-04-25 14:36
00141 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Steve Newcomb 2016-04-25 15:21
00099 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Dave Pawson 2016-04-25 15:56
00108 XML to troff still at work Simon St.Laurent 2016-04-25 16:03
00155 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Steve Newcomb 2016-04-25 18:18
00143 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Peter Flynn 2016-04-25 21:35
00147 Re: [xml-dev] XML to troff still at work Liam R. E. Quin 2016-04-27 19:00
00152 Re: [xml-dev] XML to troff still at work Peter Flynn 2016-04-27 20:05
00109 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Rick Jelliffe 2016-04-28 06:42
00098 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity [email protected] 2016-04-28 09:14
00113 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Thomas Passin 2016-04-28 14:12
00095 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Liam R. E. Quin 2016-04-28 17:50
00139 Fw: new message Stan Wakefield 2016-04-28 18:00
00120 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity John Cowan 2016-04-28 18:50
00067 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Peter Flynn 2016-04-28 20:02
00081 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Steve Newcomb 2016-04-28 20:18
00082 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity dal 2016-04-28 20:23
00065 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Liam R. E. Quin 2016-04-28 23:22
00123 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-29 02:16
00136 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Arjun Ray 2016-04-29 02:23
00125 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Christopher R. Maden 2016-04-29 03:20
00133 Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Serhiy Hapiy 2016-04-29 05:36
00179 SGML default attributes. Dave Pawson 2016-04-29 08:33
00182 Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition to parsing)? XML Parser = Parser + DTD Validator? Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-29 11:14
00167 Re: [xml-dev] Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition to parsing)? XML Parser = Parser + DTD Validator? Ghislain Fourny 2016-04-29 11:21
00164 Re: [xml-dev] Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition to parsing)? XML Parser = Parser + DTD Validator? Michael Kay 2016-04-29 11:26
00165 RE: [xml-dev] Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition to parsing)? XML Parser = Parser + DTD Validator? Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-29 11:40
00166 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. harvey 2016-04-29 12:07
00183 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Norman Gray 2016-04-29 12:54
00178 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Simon St.Laurent 2016-04-29 13:16
00181 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Dave Pawson 2016-04-29 14:06
00180 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Christopher R. Maden 2016-04-29 14:55
00174 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Dave Pawson 2016-04-29 15:30
00171 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Jim Tivy 2016-04-29 15:41
00187 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Norman Gray 2016-04-29 16:28
00188 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. John Cowan 2016-04-29 16:58
00189 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Steve Newcomb 2016-04-29 17:30
00186 Use DTDs! Costello, Roger L. 2016-04-29 17:40
00172 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. John Cowan 2016-04-29 17:44
00173 Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs! Liam R. E. Quin 2016-04-29 18:12
00169 Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs! G. Ken Holman 2016-04-29 19:27
00175 Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs! Simon St.Laurent 2016-04-29 19:59
00168 Old tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Peter Flynn 2016-04-29 20:04
00177 Re: [xml-dev] Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition to parsing)? XML Parser = Parser + DTD Validator? Peter Flynn 2016-04-29 20:15
00190 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Peter Flynn 2016-04-29 20:31
00185 Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs! Peter Flynn 2016-04-29 20:55
00184 Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs! John Cowan 2016-04-29 22:34
00191 Re: [xml-dev] Old tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity Lauren Wood 2016-04-29 23:10
00176 Re: [xml-dev] Old tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity harvey 2016-04-30 02:15
00170 Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes. Dave Pawson 2016-04-30 07:25