| 00000 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-17 (SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-17.doc) modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-01 10:44 |
| 00001 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-31 (SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-31.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-01 10:53 |
| 00002 |
[NEW ISSUE] The Bindings specifications should provide exemplaryImplementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-02-04 14:55 |
| 00003 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-31 (SCABindings minutes 2008-01-31.doc) uploaded |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-04 18:21 |
| 00004 |
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: The Bindings specifications should provideexemplary Implementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-04 19:45 |
| 00005 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-31 (SCA Bindingsminutes 2008-01-31.doc) uploaded |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2008-02-05 11:39 |
| 00006 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-31 (SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-31.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-05 11:39 |
| 00007 |
Re: ISSUE 18 - Clarify the rules on which queues and topics are used forresponses and callbacks |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2008-02-05 14:43 |
| 00008 |
Is there going to be a F2F on week of Mar 4 in Boston? |
Tom Rutt
|
2008-02-06 18:44 |
| 00009 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Is there going to be a F2F on week of Mar 4 inBoston? |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-06 19:25 |
| 00010 |
RE: [sca-bindings] Is there going to be a F2F on week of Mar 4 in Boston? |
Michael Rowley
|
2008-02-06 20:51 |
| 00011 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-07 10:23 |
| 00012 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-07 15:03 |
| 00013 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Is there going to be a F2F on week of Mar 4 inBoston? |
Tom Rutt
|
2008-02-07 17:12 |
| 00014 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Is there going to be a F2F on week of Mar 4 in Boston? |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2008-02-08 00:08 |
| 00015 |
Groups - SCA Bindings TC Face to Face meeting added |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-08 10:45 |
| 00016 |
Groups - SCA Bindings TC Face to Face meeting added |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-08 10:46 |
| 00017 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-08 10:51 |
| 00018 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-08 10:52 |
| 00019 |
Looking forward to the face-to-face in Burlington |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-13 22:29 |
| 00020 |
RE: [sca-bindings] Looking forward to the face-to-face in Burlington |
Peshev, Peter
|
2008-02-13 22:54 |
| 00021 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Face-to-face in Burlington - JCA on agenda? |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-13 23:34 |
| 00022 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-14 09:38 |
| 00023 |
Raw transcript of 2/14/08 conf-call |
Patil, Sanjay
|
2008-02-14 18:05 |
| 00024 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2008-02-14 (SCA Bindings minutes 2008-02-14.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-19 10:33 |
| 00025 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-31 (SCA Bindings minutes 2008-01-31.doc) modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-19 10:33 |
| 00026 |
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE 19: Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.bindingwith reference targets |
Simon Nash
|
2008-02-21 10:46 |
| 00027 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE 19: Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.binding with reference targets |
Michael Rowley
|
2008-02-21 15:47 |
| 00028 |
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE 19: Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.bindingwith reference targets |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-02-21 15:52 |
| 00029 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: Callbacks for binding.ws |
Michael Rowley
|
2008-02-21 15:55 |
| 00030 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: The Bindings specifications should provide exemplary Implementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
Peshev, Peter
|
2008-02-21 16:02 |
| 00031 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: The Bindings specifications should provideexemplary Implementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-02-21 16:14 |
| 00032 |
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: Callbacks for binding.ws |
Tom Rutt
|
2008-02-21 17:55 |
| 00033 |
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE 19: Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.bindingwith reference targets |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-21 20:00 |
| 00034 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: The Bindings specifications should provide exemplary Implementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
Patil, Sanjay
|
2008-02-22 00:57 |
| 00035 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: The Bindings specifications should provideexemplary Implementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-02-22 14:36 |
| 00036 |
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE 19: Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.bindingwith reference targets |
Simon Nash
|
2008-02-22 16:37 |
| 00037 |
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: Callbacks for binding.ws |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-22 21:51 |
| 00038 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: The Bindings specifications should provideexemplary Implementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
David Booz
|
2008-02-22 22:41 |
| 00039 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: Callbacks for binding.ws |
Michael Rowley
|
2008-02-25 20:31 |
| 00040 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: The Bindings specifications should provide exemplary Implementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
Michael Rowley
|
2008-02-25 20:39 |
| 00041 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: The Bindings specifications should provide exemplary Implementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
Michael Rowley
|
2008-02-25 20:43 |
| 00042 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-26 10:27 |
| 00043 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-26 10:43 |
| 00044 |
Groups - SCA Bindings TC Face to Face meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-26 10:50 |
| 00045 |
Groups - SCA Bindings TC Face to Face meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-26 10:51 |
| 00046 |
Face to face next week |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2008-02-26 10:54 |
| 00047 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-26 11:00 |
| 00048 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-26 11:00 |
| 00049 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-26 11:00 |
| 00050 |
Warning - US Daylight Savings time and European Summer time discrepancy |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2008-02-26 11:02 |
| 00051 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-22: The Bindings specifications should provideexemplary Implementations for a) Callbacks and b) Conversations |
David Booz
|
2008-02-27 03:06 |
| 00052 |
NEW ISSUE: binding.ws @wsdlElement definition needs clarificationon "equivalent" and use of WSDL 2.0 constructs |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-27 05:35 |
| 00053 |
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-23: binding.ws @wsdlElement definition needsclarification on "equivalent" and use of WSDL 2.0 constructs |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-27 06:49 |
| 00054 |
Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-27 10:59 |
| 00055 |
Groups - SCA Bindings TC Face to Face meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-27 11:17 |
| 00056 |
Groups - SCA Bindings TC Face to Face meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-27 12:08 |
| 00057 |
Issue-19: different proposal for resolution... |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-27 22:42 |
| 00058 |
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-20 - useful URL. |
Eric Johnson
|
2008-02-28 05:59 |
| 00059 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Issue-19: different proposal for resolution... |
Simon Nash
|
2008-02-28 14:42 |
| 00060 |
RE: [sca-bindings] ISSUE 19: Web Service binding should allow #wsdl.binding with reference targets |
Michael Rowley
|
2008-02-28 22:07 |
| 00061 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2008-02-28 (SCA Bindings minutes 2008-02-28.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-29 11:01 |
| 00062 |
Groups - SCA Bindings TC Face to Face meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-29 11:06 |
| 00063 |
Groups - SCA Bindings TC Face to Face meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-29 11:09 |
| 00064 |
Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2008-02-14 (SCA Bindings minutes 2008-02-14.doc) modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-29 11:16 |
| 00065 |
Groups - SCA Bindings TC Face to Face meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-02-29 11:40 |